The experimental research has two key advantages over correlational studies.
1. The possibility of random assignment
2. Causal connections can be assumed.
<h3>
What benefit does experimental research have over correlational research?</h3>
Correlational studies merely examine the data that already exists, whereas experimental studies give the researcher the opportunity to influence the study's factors. Researchers can make inferences about how changes in one variable affect changes in another through the use of experimental investigations.
The factors in a correlation study are out of the control of the researcher or research team. The researcher merely measures the information she discovers in the outside world. She can then determine whether changes in one are related to changes in the other, or if the two variables are correlated. In such a study, experimenters gather existing data and use statistical methods to examine it, such as economic statistics from governments. The findings of correlation studies can lead to hypotheses that can be verified through a more focused experimental one.
To learn more about correlational research visit:
brainly.com/question/14375687
#SPJ4
Answer:
"$66.5
Step-by-step explanation:
The cost, including tax, amounts to $850.00.
Down payment =$150
Amount after paying down payment = $850-$150=$700
Interest rate = 14 %
So, interest on $700 =
So, c = $98
Total payment = amount financed + c = 700+98=$798
Now Joe finances the grill over 12 months
So, no. of payments = 12
Now Monthly payment = Total of payments ÷ number of payments
=798 ÷ 12
=$66.5
Hence Joe's monthly payments (principal plus interest) is $ 66.5" i quoted so give the other person brainliest!
Step-by-step explanation:
I think it’s C merry Christmas
Step-by-step explanation:
The area of a square is
where s is the side length.
It is given that the smaller square side length is s so that means the area of that smaller square is the formula above.
The longer square is twice the side length of the side length of the smaller square.
Since all squares have equal sides, that means all the side are twice than the smaller square sides.
We can represent that larger square area by
(4s) squared
To find how many smaller squares it would take to fill the larger square divide the formula by each other.
(4s)÷s squared =4
Answer:
180-65 = 115
Step-by-step explanation:
it is 115 since <7 <6 are a linear pair so they make a 180 angle so 180-65 is 115
