Answer:
Molarity = 0.08 M
Explanation:
Given data:
Mass of copper sulfate = 3.8 g
Volume of water = 250 cm³ (250/1000 = 0.25 L)
Concentration of solution = ?
Solution:
Number of moles of copper sulfate:
Number of moles = mass/molar mass
Number of moles = 3.8 g/ 159.6 g/mol
Number of moles = 0.02 mol
Concentration:
Molarity = Number of moles / volume in L
By putting values,
Molarity = 0.02 mol / 0.25 L
Molarity = 0.08 mol/L
Molarity = 0.08 M
Kc=24.4=[HX]∧2/[H2]×[X2] =(0.6)∧2/(0.2)×[H2]
[H2] = 0.36/(24.4×0.2) = 0.07377 mole
Answer:
Explanation:
i notice that theri is no image so i wont be able to help you sorry
The reaction between NaOH and Cu(NO₃)₂ is as follows
2NaOH + Cu(NO₃)₂ ---> 2NaNO₃ + Cu(OH)₂
Q1)
stoichiometry of NaOH to Cu(NO₃)₂ is 2:1
this means that 2 mol of NaOH reacts with 1 mol of Cu(NO₃)₂
the mass of Cu(NO₃)₂ reacted - 0.8024 g
molar mass of Cu(NO₃)₂ is 187.56 g/mol
therefore the number of Cu(NO₃)₂ moles that have reacted
- 0.8024 g/ 187.56 g/mol = 0.00427 mol
according to the stoichiometry , number of NaOH moles - 0.00427 mol x 2
then number of NaOH moles that have reacted - 0.00855 mol
In a 3.0 M NaOH solution, 3 moles are in 1000 mL of solution
Then volume required for 0.00855 mol - 1000 x 0.00855 /3 = 2.85 mL
2.85 mL of 3.0 M NaOH is required for this reaction
Q2)
Assuming that there's 100 % yield of Cu(OH)₂ , we can directly calculate the mass of Cu(OH)₂ formed from the number of moles of reactants that were used up.
Stoichiometry of Cu(NO₃)₂ to Cu(OH)₂ is 1:1
this means that 1 mol of Cu(NO₃)₂ gives a yield of 1 mol of Cu(OH)₂
the number of Cu(NO₃)₂ moles that reacted - 0.00427 mol
Therefore an equal amount of moles of Cu(OH)₂ were formed
Then amount of Cu(OH)₂ moles produced - 0.00427 mol
Mass of Cu(OH)₂ formed - 0.00427 mol x 97.56 g/mol = 0.42 g
A mass of 0.42 g of Cu(OH)₂ was formed in this reaction
Answer:
2NaCl + CuCO3
FeCl2 + BaSO4
CuCO3 + Ca(NO3)2
Explanation:
<em>Presumably this is a double replacement reaction.</em>
<em>A+B</em><em> </em><em>+</em><em> </em><em>C</em><em>+</em><em>D</em><em> </em><em>→</em><em> </em><em>A+D</em><em> </em><em>+</em><em> </em><em>C+B</em>
<em>It</em><em> </em><em>seems</em><em> </em><em>I</em><em> </em><em>may</em><em> </em><em>be</em><em> </em><em>wrong</em><em> </em><em>so</em><em> </em><em>please</em><em> </em><em>try</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>work</em><em> </em><em>out</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>problem</em><em> </em><em>yourself</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>double</em><em> </em><em>check</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>keeping</em><em> </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>mind</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>charges</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>each</em><em> </em><em>compound</em><em>.</em>