Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Cant anwer becausr idk what the triangle looks like
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Hi there!
We want to solve for
in:

Since
is in the argument of
, let's first isolate
by dividing both sides by 4:

Next, recall that
is just shorthand notation for
. Therefore, take the square root of both sides:

Simplify using
:

Let
.
<h3><u>Case 1 (positive root):</u></h3>

Therefore, we have:

<h3><u>Case 2 (negative root):</u></h3>

Answer:
sorry cant help with this one
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
4
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello There!
To find the slope we can use the slope formula
let m = slope

now lets find two points so we can plug the values into the formula
the points chosen is optional but the points i chose were
(5,20) and (15,60)
remember when plugging in the values into the formula we plug in the second ordered pair first so
also remember that the y values go on top and the x values go on the bottom

So we can conclude that the slope of the line is 4