Answer:
For the tear 2019, net income is 40,000
Beginning of the year 2019, asset of the S are 200,000
Ending of the year 2019, asset of the S are 300,000
Average asset for 2019= Beginning assets + Closing assets / 2
Average asset for 2019= 200,000 + 300,000 / 2
Average asset for 2019= $250,000
Return on assets = Net income / Average assets * 100%
= 40,000 / 250,000 * 100
=16%
Thus, the return on assets is 16%
Conclusion: If the average return of assets of the competitors are 11%, It means S uses the assets efficient manner, so performance of the S is very good ad return of the S is higher than competitors on asset
D.9,340 I hope this helps hopefully I did the math right
More accurate estimates and higher motivation are generally the results of using a(n) participative budget.
What is meant by participative budgeting?
In a budgeting procedure called participatory budgeting, those in lower levels of management take part in the creation of the budget.
What are the benefits of participative budgeting?
Participatory budgeting undoubtedly provides a number of benefits, including goal congruence, fiscal responsibility, information sharing from inferior to superior, and greater subordinate work satisfaction.
Is participatory budgeting effective?
The highest-ranking engagement strategy on the participation rung is participatory budgeting because of this. Although it necessitates thorough planning and preparation, it also strengthens the legitimacy of your decision-making and the level of confidence that the community's residents have in their elected officials.
Learn more about participatory budgeting: brainly.com/question/14473563
#SPJ4
Answer:
There will be a difference in the income .
Absorption costing income will be lower as it transfers all the fixed costs to the ending inventory.
Variable costing income will be higher as it does not transfer the fixed costs to the ending inventory.
The difference will be of $ 104000
Explanation:
Increase in units 8000
Variable Fixed
Unit manufacturing costs of the period $24.00 $10.00
Unit operating expenses of the period 8.00 3.00
Total Unit Costs $ 32.00 $ 13.00
The net operating income under variable costing for the year will be $ 13* 8000= $ 104000 Lower than the net operating income under absorption costing. This is because the all fixed costs will be treated as period cost rather than product costs.
In variable costing the ending inventory will be $104000 lower than the ending inventory under absorption costing because the fixed costs will not be allocated to products.
Under variable costing, the units in the ending inventory will be costed at $32 each.Under absorption costing, the units in the ending inventory will be costed at $32+ $ 13= $ 45 each.