Before the times of the labor unions, both the employer and the employee reserved the right of employment at will, meaning either one could terminate the agreement at any time and for any reason.
The correct term for the situation proposed in the question is employment at will. The other options describe agreements that have arisen since the creation of the labor unions.
The first option, a closed shop, described an agreement made between the hiring party and the labor unions in which the hiring party agrees to <u>only hire members of the union</u>, while an open shop is just the opposite.
Collective bargaining, on the other hand, is the long process in which the workers of an institution work through their labor unions in order to <u>negotiate contracts </u><u>and the terms of </u><u>employment</u><u>, which include income and benefits. </u>
Therefore the only option that existed prior to the development of labor unions is employment at will, which allowed the termination of a contract at any time for any reason.
To learn more visit:
brainly.com/question/518131?referrer=searchResults
The way economists would probably explain the wastage of
this clam resource is by saying that clams are free goods and are therefore
subject to the tragedy of the commons effect. The tragedy of the commons effect
is a theory in economics, postulated by the Victorian economist William Forster
Lloyd.
The tragedy of the commons effect describes a condition
within a shared-resource system where each user act freely according to their
own self-interest, but their collective actions ends in the depletion or spoilage
of that resource, thus having a negative impact on the common good of all users.
In this case, commons is taken to refer to the clam resources.
Answer:
secure
Explanation:
A secure loan is backed by collateral or assets of value
You need conversion in this problem to solve it. Since you are already given of all the data, you just need to utilize the data to come up with the answer. You simply have to divide the equivalent units of a barrel with the U.S. barrels and further divide it with the equivalent gallons of U.S. barrel. You can get $2.24 ($94 / 31.5 / 1.33).<span> </span>
The factors that make capital appreciation bonds (CABs) a controversial method for local governments to finance projects include "Local governments tend to owe investors way above the amount borrowed."
Another factor that makes capital appreciation bonds (CABs) a controversial method for local governments to finance projects is that they enable local governments to fund new projects without raising taxes.
Capital appreciation bonds (CABs) is often described as a form of municipal security whereby its interest on principal rises and compounds until maturity.
Capital appreciation bonds (CABs) allows investor earns a sole payment indicating the face value of the bond and all accrued interest.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Capital appreciation bonds (CABs) are a controversial method of financing projects.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/14325978
