I believe it is an imaginary number because imaginary numbers are square roots of negative numbers.
When you have two parallel lines being cut by a transversal, you can use the next statements for the angles:
The measurement of the angles in green is the same (are congruents)
The measurement of the angles in blue is the same (are congruents)
An angle in green is a complementary angle with an angle in blue. (The addition of the two angles has to be 180º)
You know that:
As the angle 3 is congruent with angle 2:
Answer:
Sorry im not good at diameters
Step-by-step explanation:
hopefully this helps. since its divided by 2 x would be 4 and y would be 2.5
Answer:
The regression line is not a good model because there is a pattern in the residual plot.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given is a residual plot for a data set
The residual plot shows scatter plot of x and y
The plotting of points show that there is not likely to be a linear trend of relation between the two variables. It is more likely to be parabolic or exponential.
Hence the regression line cannot be a good model as they do not approach 0.
Also there is not a pattern of linear trend.
D) The regression line is not a good model because there is a pattern in the residual plot.
Answer:
a) 90 stamps
b) 108 stamps
c) 333 stamps
Step-by-step explanation:
Whenever you have ratios, just treat them like you would a fraction! For example, a ratio of 1:2 can also look like 1/2!
In this context, you have a ratio of 1:1.5 that represents the ratio of Canadian stamps to stamps from the rest of the world. You can set up two fractions and set them equal to each other in order to solve for the unknown number of Canadian stamps. 1/1.5 is representative of Canada/rest of world. So is x/135, because you are solving for the actual number of Canadian stamps and you already know how many stamps you have from the rest of the world. Set 1/1.5 equal to x/135, and solve for x by cross multiplying. You'll end up with 90.
Solve using the same method for the US! This will look like 1.2/1.5 = x/135. Solve for x, and get 108!
Now, simply add all your stamps together: 90 + 108 + 135. This gets you a total of 333 stamps!
