1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Naily [24]
2 years ago
13

10 十w=-9 I’m very confused please help

Mathematics
2 answers:
cricket20 [7]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

w = -19

Step-by-step explanation:

10 + w = -9

<u>-10         -10</u>

w = -9 - 10

w = -19

Kazeer [188]2 years ago
4 0
The answer is this one: w=-19
You might be interested in
if you take my age and divide it by any off number greater than 1 and less than 9 you will get a remainder of 1
postnew [5]

Answer:

no???

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
A farmer has 200 feet of fencing to use for a chicken pen. He wants the width of the pen to be 27 feet. What will the length be?
FromTheMoon [43]

Answer:

Length will be 173

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which polynomial is equal to (x + 1)(2x + 1)
VladimirAG [237]

Answer:

2x^2+3x+1

Step-by-step explanation:

FOIL

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
25 Points! Midterm Today! Can anyone help with this problem?
Andrews [41]
I really do wish I could help But I’m not sure I tried to figure it out and i just can’t get it
6 0
3 years ago
A data mining routine has been applied to a transaction dataset and has classified 88 records as fraudulent (30 correctly so) an
chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

The classification matrix is attached below

Part a

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is 65.91%.

Part b

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is 96.64%

Step-by-step explanation:

The classification matrix is obtained as shown below:

The transaction dataset has 30 fraudulent correctly classified records out of 88 records, that is, 30 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is negative.

Also, there would be 88 - 30 = 58 non-fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 58 records are incorrectly predicted given that an instance is positive.

The transaction dataset has 920 non-fraudulent correctly classified records out of 952 records, that is, 920 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is positive.

Also, there would be 952 - 920 = 32 fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 32 records incorrectly predicted given that an instance is negative.

That is,

                                                                            Predicted value

                           Active value                 Fraudulent       Non-fraudulent

                              Fraudlent                         30                       58

                          non-fraudulent                   32                     920

The classification matrix is obtained by using the information related to the transaction data, which is classified into fraudulent records and non-fraudulent records.

The error rate is obtained as shown below:

The error rate is obtained by taking the ratio of \left( {b + c} \right)(b+c) and the total number of records.

The classification matrix is, shown above

The total number of records is, 30 + 58 + 32 + 920 = 1,040

The error rate is,

\begin{array}{c}\\{\rm{Error}}\,{\rm{rate}} = \frac{{b + c}}{{{\rm{Total}}}}\\\\ = \frac{{58 + 32}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = \frac{{90}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = 0.0865\\\end{array}  

The percentage is 0.0865 \times 100 = 8.65

(a)

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained by taking the rate ratio of b and \left( {a + b} \right)(a+b) .

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown above and in the attachment

The error rate for truly fraudulent is,

\begin{array}{c}\\FP = \frac{b}{{a + b}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{30 + 58}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{88}}\\\\ = 0.6591\\\end{array}  

The percentage is, 0.6591 \times 100 = 65.91

(b)

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained by taking the ratio of d and \left( {c + d} \right)(c+d) .

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown in the attachment

The error rate for truly non-fraudulent is,

\begin{array}{c}\\TP = \frac{d}{{c + d}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{32 + 920}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{952}}\\\\ = 0.9664\\\end{array}

The percentage is, 0.9664 \times 100 = 96.64

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Original price is $29.99 markdown 33 1/3%
    7·2 answers
  • Write each fraction as a decimal use bar notation if necessary -6/7
    5·1 answer
  • 1/3 plus - 7/4 as a fraction simplest form
    11·1 answer
  • How many integers from 0 through 30, including 0 and 30, must you pick to be sure of getting at least one integer?
    5·1 answer
  • The weight needed to balance a lever varies inversely with the distance
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the equation of a line that passes through (-2,1) and (-4,-3)?
    8·1 answer
  • If, for a sample in which the subjects are randomly chosen, the mean income is $45,000, the sample size is 1600, the standard de
    7·1 answer
  • A water truck is filling a swimming pool. The equation that represents this
    8·1 answer
  • Ryan claims that any fraction located between 1/5 and 1/3 on a number line must have a denominator of 4. Enter a fraction that s
    15·1 answer
  • What is the GCF of 30 and 45?<br> What is the LCM of 3 and 8?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!