Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Yes, this implies that without conflict, a person stagnates.
"Where, however, the problem is objectively considered, although the conflict is a social one, it should not resolve itself into a struggle between the selves, but into such a reconstruction of the situation that different and enlarged and more adequate personalities may emerge. A tension should always be centered on the objective social field.
Answer:
Incorrect
Explanation:
The correct answer is The Jetsons
The answer is Equilibrium model of social change. A very long while back, Talcott Parsons in the year 1966, the main twentieth-century figure in the functionalist hypothesis, exhibited a harmony model of social change. Parsons said that society is dependably in a characteristic condition of balance, characterized as a condition of equivalent adjust among restricting powers.
Answer:
Unfocused interaction
Explanation:
Unfocused interaction is a behavior in which two or more people, sharing the same space, interact between them with <u>gestures or signals</u> (body language) without any kind of vocal communication.
Even if Trevor is wearing his headphones, listening only to the music (not his sorroundings) he knows, as well as the other passegners of the subway, that it is better no to bump each other shoulders (we all hate that), and, by "tacit agreeement", both Trevor and the passengers around him, will avoid bumping shoulders, even if no one talks about it.
The only possible remaining question may be the <u>cause </u>of it, and i think there are a bunch of reasons for it, but probably the best one is the force of habit.
It is called a Referendum
hope this helps
