Answer:
False.
Explanation:
The concept of "Nash equilibrium" is been by economist and also by "gamers" in game theory. Nash equilibrium is so good for making decisions and the determination of strategies.
In playing this game, the players or participants can use the pure strategy or the mixed strategy. The mixed strategy is the use of different strategies randomly.
"If a player chooses a mixed strategy in a Nash equilibrium, this implies that the payoff from using that mixed strategy is the same as the payoff from using any of the pure strategies in it".
The statement given above is FALSE because the PAYOFF WILL INCREASE IF WE ARE TO PLAY A MIXED STRATEGY.
For instance if we have a head of 1 and -1, and a tail of -1 and 1, the payoff for pure strategy is likely one or minus one but for a mixed strategy it could be zero.
Answer:
Mel
If Mel is risk-neutral, then in the absence of trip insurance, the most she will be willing to pay for the cruise is _______.
c. $1,220
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Mel's value of a cruise in nice weather = $2,000
Mel's value of a cruise in bad weather = $50
Probability of nice weather = 60%
Probability of bad weather = 40%
Expected value:
Weather Outcome Probability Expected Value
Nice weather $2,000 60% $1,200
Bad weather $50 40% $20
Total expected value of a cruise $1,220
Answer:
Yes, I do agree with the statement
Explanation:
The statement which is stating that the company net income as well as the statement of the owner's equity both are included or shown indirectly in the company balance sheet . As balance sheet is that statement which tells the financial position or performance of the company at a specific time period.
Because the net income is the outcome of income statement and directly shown or stated in the income statement whereas owner's equity is the capital of the business which is shown in the balance sheet. Net income is already included in retained earnings which means shown indirectly in the balance sheet.
Answer:
Depends on what you define as small business, if you mean a mom and pop pharmaceutical store across the road that keeps the money within the family and has every member of the family working in the shop to create an infinite amount of revenue for themselves until they hit a profit, then sure. They contribute tax dollars to the community through supplying jobs and creating cheaper cost for locals, which gives incentive to buy more in bulk and thus creating more tax dollars. Unless you are talking about the man in the apartment building who makes home grade meals and sells them cheap to his community, then no. While he is contributing tax dollars all those dollars aren't going back into the community until he buys something with that money, and the people who spent that money just got a tax free meal that 't go into the community didn't.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Using Fisher equation <u><em>(Which is estimating the financial mathematics and economics relationship among real interest rates nominal interest rates under inflation.) </em></u>which goes like this
where
Inflation = (1+0.08) / (1+0.06) - 1 = 1.88% (Could be approximated as 2%)
