Answer:
c. Both of the above are TRUE.
Answer:
"Opponents of the War Powers Resolution have traditionally claimed that clause 11 confers upon Congress only a narrow piece of war power. Defenders of the Resolution have argued in contrast that the Resolution constitutes an exercise of congressional authority under the clause. This last contention pokes at the truth without quite striking it. The War Powers Resolution is not constitutional as an exercise of the war power. It is constitutional because it defines the war power. The War Powers Resolution is nothing more or less than a congressional definition of the word "war" in article I. A definition of this kind coupled with a reasonable enforcement mechanism is well within the power of Congress under a proper understanding of the constitutional system of checks and balances. The definition does not intrude on any presidential prerogative. The mechanisms chosen by Congress to enforce the provisions of the Resolution were reasonable in 1973 and, although matters have been complicated by the United States Supreme Court's decision late last Term in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, those mechanisms remain reasonable today."
Explanation:
Answer:
Britain needed money from the seven years war and decided to tax the colonies more than previously. The British government decided to tax the imported resources the American Colonies needed like Tea.
Explanation:
A draft is any piece of written legislation, at whatever stage of preparation, that has not yet been introduced as a bill or offered as an amendment. ENGROSS. Engross means to incorporate the amendments and corrections into the text of the bill after a committee or either house has adopted it.