The correct answer is C. Eventually
Explanation:
An appropriate transition should always show the relationship between two sentences or two grammatical elements. In the case of the sentence "The Tennessee Valley Authority erected 20 dams, ________ providing much-needed jobs for up to 40,000 workers" it is suggested the jobs given to 40,000 workers were the result or consequence to the construction of 20 dams.
According to this, it is necessary to include a consequence transition such as therefore, thus or eventually. This means in this case the best option is "eventually" because this is the only transition that shows the consequence relationship between the two sentences; while the transition "because of" is used to show cause, "despite" is used to show contrast and "in addition" is used to add information.
When we find that a person has high status in certain valued dimensions and low status in others, this is <u>Status Incongruence. </u>
Status incongruence occurs:
- When a person scores high in a several dimensions but low in others
- When a person has a job that does not match their characteristics
When status incongruence happens, it can lead to conflict in the workplace as jealousy may arise in coworkers that would be directed towards the person with status incongruence.
In conclusion, the situation described is status incongruence.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/1191818. </em>
Answer: the answer is Regulatory pillar
Explanation:
Quizle Romila ensures that she pays taxes out of fear that she might be caught and sent to prison for evading taxes. The given example shows the influence of regulatory pillar on people’s behavior.
The regulatory pillar is the forceful power of the government exercised through laws,regulations and rules.
Romila was influenced by the mentality of been prosecuted if she avoids paying of taxes
Answer: Dissenting Opinion
-----
Usually when decision is written, justices can write a concurring opinion if they would like to add something to the decision or if they agree with the decision, but disagrees with the reasoning. On the other hand, if they do not agree with the majority (aka the decision), they can write a dissenting opinion.
Answer:
Explanation:kvdasnsvksgkgkgsdgtrgfgfdgfdgfdgfdgdggdgdgdgdgd is tht good enough?
