The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: (1) he upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws. If King admits that breaking laws in order to change them is "a legitimate concern," then here are the two reasons for his defense of civil disobedience (1) h<span>e upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws.</span>
Answer:
The description corresponds to an observational study.
Explanation:
In Observational studies, researchers observe the effect of a risk factor without changing what is exposed to it or its conditions. On the other hand, in an experimental study, researchers can introduce a change and study the effects of it.
Answer: There movement kind-off help them exercise and there ideas make the society a better place. The effect off the movement makes them have less food cause they can't carry all there foods to where they are moving to.
Explanation: Well if you move a lot you burn lots of calories and if they come up with an idea they tell the king and him might like or not like it. And if they move a lot they will have less food cause you can't carry all the food you have.
By the way I am 12.