Let me express the equation clearly:
lim x→-9 (x²-81)/(x+9)
Initially, we solve this by substituting x=-9 to the equation.
((-9)²-81)/(-9+9) = 0/0
The term 0/0 is undefined. This means that the solution is not see on the number line because it is imaginary. Other undefined terms are N/0 (where N is any number), 0⁰, 0×∞, ∞-∞, 1^∞ and ∞/∞. One way to solve this is by applying L'Hopitals Rule. This can be done by differentiating the numerator and denominator of the fraction independently. Then, you can already substitute the x=-9.
(2x-0)/(1+0) = 2x = 2(-9) = -18
The other easy way is to substitute x=-8.999 to the original equation. Note that the term x→-9 means that x only approaches to -9. Thus, you substitute a number that is very close to -9. Substituting x=-8.999
((-8.999)²-81)/(-8.999+9) = -18
I don’t know there’s no picture B?
x = total amount split between Adam and Tom.
since we know the total amount split between both in a 18 : 17 ratio is "x", let's divide "x" by (18 + 17) and distribute accordingly to get the amount of each.
![\stackrel{Adam~received}{18\cdot \cfrac{x}{18+17}}\qquad \qquad \stackrel{Tom~received}{17\cdot \cfrac{x}{18+17}} \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ \stackrel{\textit{since we know that Adam got "5" more}}{ \stackrel{Adam}{18\cdot \cfrac{x}{18+17}}~~ = ~~\stackrel{Tom}{17\cdot \cfrac{x}{18+17}~~ + ~~5} }\qquad \implies \qquad \cfrac{18x}{35}~~ + ~~\cfrac{17x}{35}+5](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cstackrel%7BAdam~received%7D%7B18%5Ccdot%20%5Ccfrac%7Bx%7D%7B18%2B17%7D%7D%5Cqquad%20%5Cqquad%20%5Cstackrel%7BTom~received%7D%7B17%5Ccdot%20%5Ccfrac%7Bx%7D%7B18%2B17%7D%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20~%5Cdotfill%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7Bsince%20we%20know%20that%20Adam%20got%20%225%22%20more%7D%7D%7B%20%5Cstackrel%7BAdam%7D%7B18%5Ccdot%20%5Ccfrac%7Bx%7D%7B18%2B17%7D%7D~~%20%3D%20~~%5Cstackrel%7BTom%7D%7B17%5Ccdot%20%5Ccfrac%7Bx%7D%7B18%2B17%7D~~%20%2B%20~~5%7D%20%7D%5Cqquad%20%5Cimplies%20%5Cqquad%20%5Ccfrac%7B18x%7D%7B35%7D~~%20%2B%20~~%5Ccfrac%7B17x%7D%7B35%7D%2B5)
![\stackrel{\textit{multiplying both sides by }\stackrel{LCD}{35}}{35\left( \cfrac{18x}{35} \right)~~ = ~~35\left( \cfrac{17x}{35}+5 \right)}\implies 18x~~ = ~~17x+175\implies \boxed{x =175} \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ \stackrel{Tom~received}{17\cdot \cfrac{x}{18+17}}\implies \cfrac{17(175)}{35}\implies \blacktriangleright 85 \blacktriangleleft](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cstackrel%7B%5Ctextit%7Bmultiplying%20both%20sides%20by%20%7D%5Cstackrel%7BLCD%7D%7B35%7D%7D%7B35%5Cleft%28%20%5Ccfrac%7B18x%7D%7B35%7D%20%5Cright%29~~%20%3D%20~~35%5Cleft%28%20%5Ccfrac%7B17x%7D%7B35%7D%2B5%20%5Cright%29%7D%5Cimplies%2018x~~%20%3D%20~~17x%2B175%5Cimplies%20%5Cboxed%7Bx%20%3D175%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20~%5Cdotfill%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Cstackrel%7BTom~received%7D%7B17%5Ccdot%20%5Ccfrac%7Bx%7D%7B18%2B17%7D%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B17%28175%29%7D%7B35%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Cblacktriangleright%2085%20%5Cblacktriangleleft)
Answer:
The difference is While pay grades are administrative classifications used primarily to standardize compensation across the military services, ranks indicate a level of responsibility (for personnel, equipment, and mission) which grows with each increase in rank.
Step-by-step explanation:
There similar because Pay grades E-1 through E-3 generally indicate basic training, advanced training or entry-level work. For the Army and Marines, E-1 corresponds to the rank of private
I hoped this helped!
Answer:
it should be 14,580 m^2
(the ^2 means squared btw)
