Answer:
x = 3
y = 4
hey, I am not 100% sure of the certainty of my answers, I am using what I remember about that topic but I do not know if it is right or wrong, I hope I have helped you, I did what I could.
Step-by-step explanation:
-3x + 2y = 23
5x + 2y = -17
X solution:
(you cancel the y)
-3x = 23
5x = -17
(you combine all the values above with those below)
2x = 6
(solve the ecuation normaly)
x = 6/2 = 3
Y solution:
(you replace the x)
-3(3) + 2y = 23
5(3) + 2y = -17
-9 + 2y = 23
15 + 2y = -17
(you combine all the values above with those below)
6 + 4y = 6
(solve the ecuation normaly)
4y = 0
y = 4
(I do not really know if the answer here is 0 or 4 since when passing the 4 to divide it would be 0/4 and I do not understand very well how that is solved)
Answer:The last question
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
(-32)^3/5 =((-32)^1/5)^3 = (-2)^3 = -8. QED
-14+3/2b-(1+2/8b), then take out the blanket become -14+3/2b-1-2/8b , get 5/4b-15=0 so 5/4b=15 ,get b=15×4÷5. b=12
Answer:
A) Yes
B) No
C) No
D) No
Step-by-step explanation:
A) Yes, every telephone number that could occur in that community will have an equal chance of being generated because the telephone numbers were generated randomly.
B) No, this method of generating telephone numbers would not result in a simple random sample (SRS) of local residences because the first three digits were generated in a different random way than the last four digits.
C) No, this method would not generate an SRS of local voters because not everybody will be pick up when they call because they may not be at home or they may be too busy to pick up.
D) No, this method is not unbiased in generating samples of households because there will be nonresponse bias since not everyone will pick up the call
