Answer:
And the January jobs numbers came out today. And while we are grateful for everyone who found work and is earning a paycheck, it is very clear our economy is still in trouble. We added just 6,000 private sector jobs in the country last month. Overall, we added 49,000 jobs. And this at a time when we have more than 10 million people out of work, 4 million people have been out of work for six months or longer, and 2.5 million women have been driven from the workforce. Fifteen million Americans are behind in their rental payments. Twenty-four million adults and twelve million children literally don’t have enough food to eat.
The advice to Kumasi Brewery Company Limited and Miklin Hotel is that by the terms of the contract, the contract <u>is repudiated</u>.
<h3>What is contract repudiation?</h3>
Contract repudiation occurs when a party to a contract cannot perform or deliver based on the terms of the contract.
A party to the contract can repudiate or cancel the contract as a remedy for non-performance, rendering the contract null and void if a party decides to go ahead with the contract performance.
Thus, the advice to Kumasi Brewery Company Limited and Miklin Hotel is that by the terms of the contract, the contract <u>is repudiated</u>.
Learn more about contract repudiation at brainly.com/question/7053473
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
King Hammurabi is popularly known as the first king of Babylon and he established the Babylonian Empire after conquering the whole of Mesopotamia. King Hammurabi enacted sets of written rules and fundamental laws to rule his subjects and it was referred to as Code of Hammurabi.
This ultimately implies that, King Hammurabi created a written set of laws to rule the Babylonians. The laws were enforced by the king's messenger.
Hence, the Code of Hammurabi is the first set of codified laws, Babylonian, enforced by messengers, equivalent of police.
Answer:
In Griffin v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination not only allows a criminal defendant to refuse to take the witness stand during his trial, but it also bars the prosecutor from urging the jury to interpret that silence as an indication that the defendant has something to hide. The Court reasons that the right against self-incrimination would be meaningless if a defendant’s exercise of the right could be used against him.
Hope this helps
Answer:
Indirect
Explanation:
I took a test on edge and got 100%
