The first false statement in the proof as it stands is in Line 5, where it is claimed that a line of length 2.83 is congruent to a line of length 4.47. This mistake cannot be corrected by adding lines to the proof.
_____
The first erroneous tactical move is in Line 4, where the length of DE is computed, rather than the length of FD. This mistake can be corrected by adding lines to the proof.
A correct SAS proof would use segment FD in Line 4, so it could be argued that the first mistake is there.
Answer:
True, see proof below.
Step-by-step explanation:
Remember two theorems about continuity:
- If f is differentiable at the point p, then f is continuous at p. This also applies to intervals instead of points.
- (Bolzano) If f is continuous in an interval [a,b] and there exists x,y∈[a,b] such that f(x)<0<f(y), then there exists some c∈[a,b] such that f(c)=0.
If f is differentiable in [0,4], then f is continuous in [0,4] (by 1). Now, f(0)=-1<0 and f(4)=3>0. Thus, we have the inequality f(0)<0<f(4). By Bolzano's theorem, there exists some c∈[0,4] such that f(c)=0.
2/5 is the answer unless your multiplying
The executor of an estate handle the financial matters, D
They also handle the property and everything else owned by their deceased client. including the sortment or thier "will".
