3 in 350 is 300 the 3 in 403 is 3
Answer:
c
Step-by-step explanation:
plot your graph and then you will see there is no line which shows there is a correlation. they're too scattered
Answer:
zero
Step-by-step explanation:
1/2 feet is less than 3/4 feet, so is insufficient length for even one propeller. No propellers can be cut from the board.
Step-by-step explanation:
<h2>
<em><u>You can solve this using the binomial probability formula.</u></em></h2><h2>
<em><u>You can solve this using the binomial probability formula.The fact that "obtaining at least two 6s" requires you to include cases where you would get three and four 6s as well.</u></em></h2><h2>
<em><u>You can solve this using the binomial probability formula.The fact that "obtaining at least two 6s" requires you to include cases where you would get three and four 6s as well.Then, we can set the equation as follows:</u></em></h2><h2>
<em><u>You can solve this using the binomial probability formula.The fact that "obtaining at least two 6s" requires you to include cases where you would get three and four 6s as well.Then, we can set the equation as follows: </u></em></h2><h2>
<em><u>You can solve this using the binomial probability formula.The fact that "obtaining at least two 6s" requires you to include cases where you would get three and four 6s as well.Then, we can set the equation as follows: P(X≥x) = ∑(k=x to n) C(n k) p^k q^(n-k) </u></em></h2><h2>
<em><u>You can solve this using the binomial probability formula.The fact that "obtaining at least two 6s" requires you to include cases where you would get three and four 6s as well.Then, we can set the equation as follows: P(X≥x) = ∑(k=x to n) C(n k) p^k q^(n-k) n=4, x=2, k=2</u></em></h2><h2>
<em><u>You can solve this using the binomial probability formula.The fact that "obtaining at least two 6s" requires you to include cases where you would get three and four 6s as well.Then, we can set the equation as follows: P(X≥x) = ∑(k=x to n) C(n k) p^k q^(n-k) n=4, x=2, k=2when x=2 (4 2)(1/6)^2(5/6)^4-2 = 0.1157</u></em></h2><h2>
<em><u>You can solve this using the binomial probability formula.The fact that "obtaining at least two 6s" requires you to include cases where you would get three and four 6s as well.Then, we can set the equation as follows: P(X≥x) = ∑(k=x to n) C(n k) p^k q^(n-k) n=4, x=2, k=2when x=2 (4 2)(1/6)^2(5/6)^4-2 = 0.1157when x=3 (4 3)(1/6)^3(5/6)^4-3 = 0.0154</u></em></h2><h2>
<em><u>You can solve this using the binomial probability formula.The fact that "obtaining at least two 6s" requires you to include cases where you would get three and four 6s as well.Then, we can set the equation as follows: P(X≥x) = ∑(k=x to n) C(n k) p^k q^(n-k) n=4, x=2, k=2when x=2 (4 2)(1/6)^2(5/6)^4-2 = 0.1157when x=3 (4 3)(1/6)^3(5/6)^4-3 = 0.0154when x=4 (4 4)(1/6)^4(5/6)^4-4 = 0.0008</u></em></h2><h2>
<em><u>You can solve this using the binomial probability formula.The fact that "obtaining at least two 6s" requires you to include cases where you would get three and four 6s as well.Then, we can set the equation as follows: P(X≥x) = ∑(k=x to n) C(n k) p^k q^(n-k) n=4, x=2, k=2when x=2 (4 2)(1/6)^2(5/6)^4-2 = 0.1157when x=3 (4 3)(1/6)^3(5/6)^4-3 = 0.0154when x=4 (4 4)(1/6)^4(5/6)^4-4 = 0.0008Add them up, and you should get 0.1319 or 13.2% (rounded to the nearest tenth)</u></em></h2>
The answer to that question is 1
