1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
morpeh [17]
3 years ago
8

Based on the meaning of the prefix mis-, meaning "not", what can you conclude is the definition of the underlined word in the fo

llowing sentence?
She mistrusted the report she read on the Internet.

a did not trust
b trusted too much
c wanted to trust
d trusted with good reason
English
2 answers:
musickatia [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: The answer would be A) did not trust.

Explanation: The reason for this is if you break up the word into "mis- " and "trusted" you know from the question that the prefix mis- means "not". Therefore if you add the prefix mis- to the word "trusted" it would mean that something is not trusted.

vesna_86 [32]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

As mis- means "not", "mistrusted" means "not trusted", which is A.

You might be interested in
Is it easy or hard to describe this in simple terms
Murrr4er [49]

Answer:

I need to know what we are describing please, and then I'll help you

Explanation:

:)

3 0
3 years ago
Identify your own ideas of how children should be educated and that you find interesting
Keith_Richards [23]

Answer:

I think that children should be educated on how to act properly around people and in public.

I hope this is at least some what helpful because I don't have anything in school about child development so yeah.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What type of phrase is in the lab
goldenfox [79]
The answer is lab 20
6 0
3 years ago
How many people does Scrooge have<br> working for him?
satela [25.4K]

Answer:

he had 6 or 4 men working for him

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read this argument from the New York Times opinion Does the author of this article agree or disagree with Dave Granlund the arti
Vikki [24]

Answer:

Nadia Arumugam will completely agree with this cartoon because she clearly stated that 'no one is completely banned from taking unlimited amounts of soda since they are not restricted from ordering two or more bottles of soda if they so desire'.

Explanation:

In the cartoon the picture of a man drinking a giant-sized soda before the ban, was compared to him after the ban buying two cans of soda. There was clearly no difference between the two because the objective of the ban which was to reduce obesity was defeated. The man remained obese.

This is in line with Nadia's argument that the ban does not prevent anyone from drinking an unlimited amount of soda since they could simply buy two or more cans if they so desire.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Arthur Miller wrote The Crucible, which depicts the 1692 Salem witch trials, in 1953. Which represents a primary source he could
    6·2 answers
  • A theme is best described as the
    8·2 answers
  • Which scenario best describes the task of personalizing an assigned topic? a. Fernando begins to think of counter-arguments for
    13·1 answer
  • Coal-fueled thermal power plants are a major source of electricity in most parts of the world. These power plants result in more
    11·1 answer
  • what is the relationship between the human rights outlined in the Declaration and an individuals success in a society? (Universa
    5·1 answer
  • Coyotito would have recovered from the scorpion’s sting even if he never had help from the doctor
    6·1 answer
  • What does the US President swear to protect and defend during the inauguration ceremony?
    14·1 answer
  • Not a promise to be found on the snow cover gram explain​
    7·1 answer
  • 2. Analyze Mr. Hooper's conversation with Elizabeth is the first time that readers learn
    7·1 answer
  • You are looking for an article in an encyclopedia, and you enter the word
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!