1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Basile [38]
3 years ago
11

A dressmaker can sew 400 garments with 100 bolts of fabric and 1,500 hours of labor. Another dressmaker can sew 400 garments wit

h 150 bolts of fabric and 1,000 hours of identical labor. Fabric costs $110 a bolt and labor costs $20 an hour. Is it possible for both methods to be economically efficient
Business
1 answer:
faust18 [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

No, because the second method has lower total costs of production.

Explanation:

In a bid to make profits businesses must always compare different processes and choose the cheapest one.

This will eventually reflect in the profitability of the business.

In this instance let's get the cost of each process.

Fabric costs $110 a bolt and labor costs $20 an hour.

The first dress maker can sew 400 garments with 100 bolts of fabric and 1,500 hours of labour

Total cost = (100 bolts * 110) + (1500 * 20)

Total cost = $41,000

For the second dress maker he can sew 400 garments with 150 bolts of fabric and 1,000 hours of identical labour

Total cost = (150 *110) + (1000 * 20)

Total cost = $36,500

As can be seen the second dressmaker has a lower cost of production so he is more efficient than the first dress maker

You might be interested in
The following data pertain to an investment proposal (Ignore income taxes.): Cost of the investment $ 64,000 Annual cost savings
Ratling [72]

Answer:

$9,201.6

Explanation:

Calculation for The net present value of the proposed investment is closest to:

Using this formula

Net Present value = (Annual cost saving * PVAF) + (Salvage value * PVIF) - Cost of investment

Let plug in the formula

PVAF (10%,5 years) = 3.7908

PVIF (10%, 5 years) = 0.6209

Net Present value = ($18,000 * 3.7908) + ($8000 * 0.6209) - $64000

Net Present value = $68,234.4+$4,967.2-$64,000

Net Present value = $9,201.6

Therefore The net present value of the proposed investment is closest to:$9,201.6

3 0
3 years ago
Pat earns $25,000 per year (after taxes), and Pat's spouse, Chris, earns $35,000 (after taxes). They have two pre-school childre
Talja [164]

Answer:

C. Value spending time with the children by more than $13,000.

Explanation:

Given that Pat earns $25,000 per year after taxes and the childcare costs $12,000 per year, the value of spending time with with the children will be more than $13,000. If Chris becomes a stay at home parent, the value would have been $23,000 as $12,000 will be paid for the childcare. The amount is calculated by finding the difference between the earnings and childcare costs.

5 0
4 years ago
What is generally the difference between blue collar workers and white collar workers
Schach [20]

Blue Collar. The term blue collar, conversely, refers to workers whose work requires manual labor. Their work can be skilled or unskilled and can fall into any number of industries. ... Blue collar workers are generally paid an hourly wage rather than a salary.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Closing entries and a post-closing trial balance are steps in the accounting cycle that occurA :  quarterly. B :  monthly. C : 
zhannawk [14.2K]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "D": annually.

Explanation:

The trial balance is a worksheet where all the balances of all the accounts are listed where the sum of all debits must equal the sum of all credits. The trial balance is an accuracy check reflecting the transactions in the general ledger were recorded correctly.

The post-closing trial balance lists the permanent account balances that the company has to transfer for the next accounting period. Both the trial balance and the post-closing trial balance are reported once a year before preparing the company's financial statements.

6 0
3 years ago
Assume that you have invested $100,000 in British equities. When purchased the stock's price and the exchange rate were £50 and
riadik2000 [5.3K]

Answer: 7.58%

Explanation:

Given Data

Invested capital = $100,000

Stock price during purchase = £50

Exchange rate = $.50/$1.00

Selling rate after 1 year = £45

Exchange rate = $.60/$1.00

HPR = gain / pain * 100

= $50,000 * $1.00/$.55 + $10,000 * $1.00/ $.60 - $100,000 / $100,000 * 100%

= $50,000 * $1.812 + $10,000 * $1.667 - $100,000 / $100,00 * 100%

= $90,909.09 + $16666.67 - $100,000 / $100,000 * 100

= $7575.76 / $100,000 *100%

= 0.0757576 * 100%

= 7.58%

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Kendrick's job responsibilities have recently been changed as part of a decentralization effort taking place at his office. He h
    14·1 answer
  • Sarah, a majority shareholder in Teal, Inc., made a $200,000 interest-free loan to the corporation. Sarah is not an employee of
    8·1 answer
  • Strategy formulation is the process of:
    7·1 answer
  • Sophia purchased a variable annuity contract with a purchase payment of $70,000. Surrender charges begin with 9 percent in the f
    12·1 answer
  • The Converting Department of Worley Company had 2,400 units in work in process at the beginning of the period, which were 35% co
    14·1 answer
  • Philosophers of ethics often contend that the argument that codes should provide action recipes for all situations neglects the
    8·1 answer
  • Hey wassup I'm lowkey bored y'all wanna do sum?
    6·2 answers
  • What type of bank account is the best person?
    10·2 answers
  • 5. When the economy is SLOWING and stock prices are FALLING, why might an investor BUY<br> stocks?
    12·1 answer
  • If a municipal firm purchases a block of municipal bonds in anticipation of a price increase, the firm is engaged in
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!