All of the given practices can be effective in minimizing group harms.
Answer: Option E
Explanation:
As mentioned in the options, a collaborative review of the ongoing research by the Institutional Review Board can be taken from time to time during the course of the research to check whether the group of human samples is facing any adverse effects of the research or not.
A chalked plan promising the disclosure of the results of the research can also help in decreasing group harm. Moreover, consultation among the parties participated in research can also reduce the risk of group harm.
Answer:
it reserves the rights to all races
Explanation:
im a history whiz :)
Answer:
A
Explanation:
it helps us to socialize with other people
1: Peninsula
2: Volcanoes
3: 4
4: Destructive Waves
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Humanistic.
Explanation:
In psychology, the humanistic approach was born as an alternative to the behaviorist and psychodynamic approaches.
Humanistic psychologists reject the deterministic assumptions often made in the behaviorist and psychodynamic perspectives. According to humanistic psychologists, both of these other approaches dehumanize human beings and see them as people who are determined by external forces rather than people with all the inner abilities and capacities to cope with life.
Humanism states that people are basically good, and have an innate need to make themselves and the world better, they also have an inner tendency to self-actualization. This approach also thinks that the subjective experiences of the individual are really important, therefore they study personality and personal experiences from the point of view of the individual's own subjective experience.
Thus, <u>the psychologists that are most likely to criticize standardized personality tests for </u><u>failing to capture the unique subjective experience of the individual personality</u><u> </u>would be the humanistic psychologists.
