1- observation
2-hypothesis
3-test hypothesis
4-analyze data
5-conclusion
Answer: Conviction based on the support of the physical fingerprint is a more reliable evidence over hair and fiber evidences.
Explanation:
Physical fingerprint has more value than hair and fiber evidences. As no two fingers can have exactly alike fingerprints belonging to the same person. The fingerprints of two identical twins cannot be alike but DNA evidence obtained from hair, fiber, or any other biological evidences can show similarity. Thus physical fingerprint have more value over DNA fingerprint it can directly related to a suspect to whom it belongs to depending upon the uniqueness of the minutiae characteristics.
This is a scientific question because you could conduct an experiment to test the theory.
It's important because it helps you measure things. The prefixes are telling you the distance or meters, etc.
Those senses are sight, smell, hearing, taste, and touch. We see with our eyes, we smell with our noses, we listen with our ears, we taste with our tongue, and we touch with our skin. Our brain receives signals from each of these organs and interprets them to give us a sense of what's happening around us.
