Answer:
yes
Explanation:
bcs that's non sense things
If its an Apex question, add options next time.
I believe the answer is: Life course perspective
Life course perspective consider both life span and the success that people have in their life to determine their health trajectory.
If measured by life course perspective, the terror attack would affect the health trajectory of the teenagers who live in that era event though they're not physically affected by it.
Explanation:
As noted, Republicans and Democrats have dominated electoral politics since the 1860s. This unrivaled record of the same two parties continuously controlling a nation’s electoral politics reflects structural aspects of the American political system as well as special features of the parties.
The standard arrangement for electing national and state legislators in the United States is the “single-member” district system, wherein the candidate who receives a plurality of the vote (that is, the greatest number of votes in the given voting district) wins the election. Although a few states require a majority of votes for election, most officeholders can be elected with a simple plurality.
Unlike proportional systems popular in many democracies, the single-member-district arrangement permits only one party to win in any given district. The single-member system thus creates incentives to form broadly based national parties with sufficient management skills, financial resources and popular appeal to win legislative district pluralities all over the country. Under this system, minor and third-party candidates are disadvantaged. Parties with minimal financial resources and popular backing tend not to win any representation at all. Thus, it is hard for new parties to achieve a viable degree of proportional representation, and achieve national clout, due to the “winner-take-all” structure of the U.S. electoral system.
Why two instead of, say, three well-financed national parties? In part because two parties are seen to offer the voters sufficient choice, in part because Americans historically have disliked political extremes, and in part because both parties are open to new ideas (see below).
Answer:
An uncommon board of trustees worked out another trade-off: Congress would have the ability to boycott the slave exchange, however not until 1800. The show cast a ballot to stretch out the date to 1808. A last significant issue including subjugation defied the agents. Southern states needed different states to return got away from slaves.
Explanation:
