So basically you use the ratio they have given you. You either multiply by 2 if image is enlarged or divide by 2 if it is reduced. (Keep in mind I got the 2 from your ratio : 1inch : 2inches) Therefore the find the original width, you multiply 10 by 2, giving you 20 inches.
The sequences that would map the triangles so as to support both claims are explained below:
<em>Transformation</em> is a process in which the dimensions, size or orientation of a given shape is <em>adjusted</em>. The types are: translation, reflection, rotation and dilation.
Thus;
A. The sequence of transformations that will <u>support</u> Tim's thinking are:
i. <em>Reflection</em> of triangle A <em>about</em> the y-axis.
ii. <em>Reflection</em> of the triangle the <em>second</em> time now about x-axis.
iii. <em>Translation</em> of the triangle two units to the right (i.e towards the x-axis)
These steps would map triangle A unto triangle B supporting Tim's claim.
B. The sequence of transformations that will <u>support</u> Jennifer's claim are:
i. First <em>rotate</em> triangle A by
using the origin of the axis as the reference point.
ii. Then <em>translate</em> triangle A two units to the right (i.e towards the x-axis).
Therefore, these steps will map triangle A unto B to support Jennifer's claim.
Visit: brainly.com/question/21388875
Step-by-step explanation:
1.

2.

this may help you(:
<h2>$2.98</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
5 bags of chips and 4 jars of dipping sauce cost $21.82. Also, 4 bags of chips and 3 jars of dipping sauce cost $16.86.
This problem can be modeled using linear equations in two variables.
Let
be the cost of a bag of chip and
be the cost of a jar of dipping sauce.
The information yields the equations

∴ A jar of dipping sauce costs
.