<span>So, they are looking for the percentage that is NOT explained...
Well, given the r we can find the percentage that IS explained by it first. That's given by r^2.
</span>Now - let's take the square of r it gives me .481636. That means that about 48% IS explained. Therefore, the part that cannot be explained
must be the missing part (out of 100% <span>so
100% - 48.1636% should be it :)
</span>
<span>So 100% - 48.1636% = 0.518364 and we want to round that off to three decimal places which will give us 0.518... and then we could convert that to a percent for the final. So 0.518 as a percentage is 51.8%! s</span>
Answer:
Using reflexive property (for side), and the transversals of the parallel lines, we can prove the two triangles are congruent.
Step-by-step explanation:
- Since AB and DC are parallel and AC is intersecting in the middle, you can make out two pairs of alternate interior angles<em>.</em> These angle pairs are congruent because of the alternate interior angles theorem. The two pairs of congruent angles are: ∠DAC ≅ ∠BCA, and ∠BAC ≅ ∠DCA.
- With the reflexive property, we know side AC ≅ AC.
- Using Angle-Side-Angle theorem, we can prove ΔABC ≅ ΔCDA.
The answer is (22) hope it helps have a great day
The image isn’t loading for me , try reuploading
Answer: radius of the largest circle is Zero.
Step-by-step explanation: A circle can't fit into an ellipse with such coordinate (3,0). What that coordinate means is that the ellipse lies along the x axis 3unit from the origin along the x axis and 0 unit from the origin along the y axis. At which no circle can fit in.
Moreso, the the coordinates at which the circle intercepts the ellipse as to be uniform not (3,0).
A circle as a constant radii coordinate on both axis.
I believe you can now see why my answer is Zero.
