The right choice is: A <em>whole</em> number constant could have been <em>subtracted</em> from the <em>exponential</em> expression.
Let be an <em>exponential</em> function of the form
, where
and
are <em>real</em> numbers. A <em>horizontal</em> asymptote exists when
, which occurs for
.
For this function, the <em>horizontal</em> asymptote is represented by
and to change the value of the asymptote we must add the <em>parent</em> function by another <em>real</em> number (
), that is to say:
(1)
In this case, we must use
to obtain an horizontal asymptote of -3. Thus, the right choice is: A <em>whole</em> number constant could have been <em>subtracted</em> from the <em>exponential</em> expression.
To learn more on asymptotes, we kindly invite to check this verified question: brainly.com/question/8493280
Answer:
a) <u>∡ADC = 270°</u>
b) <u>∠DAE = 38°</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
Using Inscribed Angle Theorem :
- ∡ADC = 2 x ∠ABC
- ∡ADC = 2 x 135°
- <u>∡ADC = 270°</u>
Similarly :
- ∠DAE = 1/2 x ∡DE
- ∠DAE = 1/2 x 76°
- <u>∠DAE = 38°</u>