Answer:
-22
Step-by-step explanation:
4 + 9 + (16 ÷ 4 - 8 - 3) × 5
= 13 + (4 - 8 - 3) × 5
= 13 - 7 × 5
= 13 - 35
= -22
Answer: 10.0
Step-by-step explanation: 10/1=10=10.0
Answer:
you could either say p(y+z)+y(y+z)or y(p+y)+ z(p+y)
Step-by-step explanation:
I cant really explain it but I hope this helps
21−=2(2−)=2cos(−1)+2 sin(−1)
−1+2=−1(2)=−1(cos2+sin2)=cos2+ sin2
Is the above the correct way to write 21− and −1+2 in the form +? I wasn't sure if I could change Euler's formula to =cos()+sin(), where is a constant.
complex-numbers
Share
Cite
Follow
edited Mar 6 '17 at 4:38
Richard Ambler
1,52199 silver badges1616 bronze badges
asked Mar 6 '17 at 3:34
14wml
23122 silver badges99 bronze badges
Add a comment
1 Answer
1
No. It is not true that =cos()+sin(). Notice that
1=1≠cos()+sin(),
for example consider this at =0.
As a hint for figuring this out, notice that
+=ln(+)
then recall your rules for logarithms to get this to the form (+)ln().
