Answer:
Remember that the unemployed are those who are out of work and who are actively looking for a job. We can calculate the unemployment rate by dividing the number of unemployed people by the total number in the labor force, then multiplying by 100.
Explanation:
The answer is: b. Deterring criminal behavior
In order to deter criminal behavior, government need to prepare a certain level of precautions in order to discourage the act of criminal behavior in a certain area.
This could be done through several methods, such as create a proper management in the department of justice, impose harsh punishments from criminal behavior in order to make people scared of doing it, or improving the economy to eliminate the needs to steals/rob in the first place.
<span>Tatiana's sister and brother-in-law visit "Paul" at the milles collines. because of the danger, they want to leave "Rwanda" and take "Tatiana" and the children with them. they feel paul is in no danger because he is a "Hutu", while they, tatiana, and the children are "Tutsi". paul says there is no danger as the "United Nations" and the "world press" are watching. later, paul is driving home and hears gunfire, shouting and glass breaking. buildings are burning. when he arrives, his family and "neighbors" are hiding in the dark. there are no "lights" on. they say there is a "rumor" that "President Habyarimana" has been "murdered", and "Tutsi rebels" have killed him. paul says this is "nonsense".</span>
Answer:
The Vikings of Norway are the first Europeans known to have visited North America (u.s.)
Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.
---
Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.
---
Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.
---
Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.
---
Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.
