Answer:
The Russian Revolution had the effect of putting an end to the major arena of fighting on the Eastern Front in World War I. It temporarily helped the Germans by freeing up troops, but this advantage did not do the Germans much good. Therefore, the revolution did not really end up making much of a difference in the outcome of the war.
Throughout WWI, the Germans were fighting a two-front war. They were fighting against France and England in the west and against Russia in the east. This meant, of course, that they had to divide their military strength between the two fronts. In 1918, the Bolsheviks concluded the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk with the Germans. Now, the Eastern Front no longer existed for the Germans. They could take their troops from that front and throw them into the Spring Offensive that started a few weeks later on the Western Front. This helped the Germans to some degree. However, the help that came from bringing the troops from the Eastern Front was negated by the influx of American troops since the US had finally started to get its military fully involved in the war by that time. Even with the movement of troops from the Eastern Front, the German offensive failed and the Germans lost the war.
Thus, the Russian Revolution did not change the outcome of the war. It changed some of the details of how the war played out, but it did not change the ultimate outcome.
Explanation:
heres the site https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/what-was-effect-russian-revolution-world-war1-461908
<span>the one that isan example of a lord is : C. a ruler whose subjects swore absolute loyalty and service
Most of the subjects that swore absolute loyalty to the lords during that period usually do that they see the lords as someone they're indebted to for saving their lives.
So it's very common that those subjects came from the enemy whose lives had been spared during a conquest</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The above description contrast with early mining operations in the American West in that the formerly conditions of the old west were completely different than the "beautiful hills, waving fields of grass, prancing mule deer, a glimmering lake . . ." description by T.H. Watkins.
Indeed, it was the opposite. American settlers that decided to bet on the west and the "gold fever," found difficult conditions and economic hardships. That was not an easy time and required extra work to find the gold.
And let's have in mind that many people that went to the west were people that have been suffering from the difficult conditions in the Plains during the so-called "Dust Bowl" period in which drought and the lack of rain killed animals and affect the production of crops.
