Answer:
No
Explanation:
Because Britain thought they were doing the right thing
Answer:
Van Gogh
Explanation:
<u>The exhibition referenced in the question is "Meet Vincent van Gogh", interactive installation exhibition that opened in London in early February. </u>
<u>The audio guide that accompanies it started a debate because the artist's name is pronounced "Van Go", like it would be pronounced in America, rather than Britain version "Van Gof". </u>
The Dutch version is more like "Van Khokh", but this event showed the name is differently pronounced in each country - <em>Gof </em>in Britan, <em>Go </em>in the US, <em>Gog</em> in France, etc.
Answer
more developed countries like USA ,give money to the developing countries in the form of aids,assistance,loans,debts .there might be different reasons:
i)To improve developing countries economic conditions
ii)For their on political interests and purposes
iii)to keep them under control and pressure
Explanation:
Answer:
(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts
Explanation:
Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.
Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.
