Answer:
Option D Showing the absence of privity of contract between it and the consumer.
Explanation:
The reason is that privity of contract says that the party of the contract are only allowable to sue each other which in other words can enforce the other to fulfill his requirements that were agreed while forming contract. So the right answer is option D because it is not related to the negligence claim.
The duty of care that the company owes towards its product's users includes using appropriate production process so that the customer will not be injured, placing the caution and warning labels so that the person can save him from the injury and the company has used components that will not harm the user of the product.
So all the options are correct except option D.
I believe the answer is: A. Fewer unwanted telemarketing calls
The consumer protect laws allow the consumers to report business practices that violate their privacy or comfort (which is what many of them consider unwanted telemarketing calls are). The protection law could also prevent the price from goes too high, but it would not necessarily lower the average prices.
Answer:
A. The statement is correct.
Explanation:
According to the law of supply, there is a positive or direct relationship between the price of wheat and the quantity of wheat supplied i.e if the price of wheat is increases then the quantity of wheat supplies is also increases and if the price of wheat decreases then the quantity of wheat supplies is also decreases that represents the direct relationship between the price and the quantity supplied
Hence, the first option is correct
<span>Because the federal reserve would want to discourage quick investments or want people to save more money right now. Long term rates would go down because these are well thought out infrastructure projects that are good for the long run.</span>
