Explanation:
Yes, evidently, the process is consistent with the scientific process because in scientific process falsification and modification are two very important traits. So this new concept have modified the existing theories.
Through the modification a theory is adjusted without undermining other discovering made through the theory's prediction.
There are many other evidences that prove this fact for example Einstien's Theory of relativity also changes the existing concepts.
Answer:
270 m/s²
Explanation:
Given:
α = 150 rad/s²
ω = 12.0 rad/s
r = 1.30 m
Find:
a
The acceleration will have two components: a radial component and a tangential component.
The tangential component is:
at = αr
at = (150 rad/s²)(1.30 m)
at = 195 m/s²
The radial component is:
ar = v² / r
ar = ω² r
ar = (12.0 rad/s)² (1.30 m)
ar = 187.2 m/s²
So the magnitude of the total acceleration is:
a² = at² + ar²
a² = (195 m/s²)² + (187.2 m/s²)²
a = 270 m/s²
F = ma
a = f/m
if f doubled , acc. will be doubled
Answer:
the claim is not valid or reasonable.
Explanation:
In order to test the claim we will find the maximum and actual efficiencies. maximum efficiency of a heat engine can be found as:
η(max) = 1 - T₁/T₂
where,
η(max) = maximum efficiency = ?
T₁ = Sink Temperature = 300 K
T₂ = Source Temperature = 400 K
Therefore,
η(max) = 1 - 300 K/400 K
η(max) = 0.25 = 25%
Now, we calculate the actual frequency of the engine:
η = W/Q
where,
W = Net Work = 250 KJ
Q = Heat Received = 750 KJ
Therefore,
η = 250 KJ/750 KJ
η = 0.333 = 33.3 %
η > η(max)
The actual efficiency of a heat engine can never be greater than its Carnot efficiency or the maximum efficiency.
<u>Therefore, the claim is not valid or reasonable.</u>
