Answer:
Choices 1 and 4 are correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
We first need to find what the slope of the line is. That way, we can find out which possible answers are perpendicular to it:
Since we now have the slope, we need the negative reciprocal of it. Remember: if x is the slope, it's negative reciprocal will be 
. Therefore, if the line's slope is 3, then we need to find answers with a slope of
.
The first answer is correct, as you have marked. The second answer, while written a little weirdly, does show the slope as 3, which we know as wrong. The third choice is not correct, however. This equation is written in point-slope form, where
. The only variable we have to worry about is m, which, in the third choice, is 3. The fourth answer is correct, which sounds weird at first. Let's put that equation into slope-intercept form:
Equations like these can be real sneaky, so it's important not to jump to conclusions with them.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The orange divisor(s) above are the prime factors of the number 1,620. If we put all of it together we have the factors 2 x 2 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 5 = 1,620. It can also be written in exponential form as 22 x 34 x 51.
Step-by-step explanation:
If a variables varies jointly, we can just divide it by the other variables in relation to it.
For example, since p variables jointly as q and square of r, then
where k is a constant
First, let find k. Substitute p= 200
q= 2, and r=3.
Now, since we know our constant, let find p.
Q is 5, and r is 2.
Answer:
Is =-61 part of the question
Step-by-step explanation:
