1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dimas [21]
3 years ago
10

2. Which is NOT in the fact family for 3, 4, and 12? 6. N fo ir

Mathematics
1 answer:
trasher [3.6K]3 years ago
4 0

Step-by-step explanation:

4÷12= 0.333333333333

12÷4=3

Since 4÷12 answer is different from the others, it's A. Let me know if this is correct! :)

You might be interested in
-4.2x 31.5=165.1 solve
Ymorist [56]

Answer:

x = −1.24

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Simplify both sides of the equation.

−132.3x=165.1

Step 2: Divide both sides by -132.3.

\frac{-132.3x}{-132.3} = \frac{165.1}{-132.3} \\

x= -1.247921

6 0
2 years ago
3. A team of eye surgeons has developed a new technique for a risky eye operation to restore the
Zigmanuir [339]

Answer:

Yes the new method if sample size was less than 20 than that of old method or identical sample numbers of old and new the differences still prove the new operation is better. As 88 patients minus 1% still shows us 76.7475 significance of  old method being low point 67.5 = 30% of 225 and proved a 65.25 low point and 69.75 high point which is also a 20% jump to new methods low point significance.

You cna show this as workings to prove or follow any of the below statements.

Where new method of 88 patients -0.01 significance rate stands at 76.7475. This figure has reduced by 11.2525 from 88 patients to 76.7 we compare this to the old method if reversing significance we find  = 62.5 and it's 30% standing value of 67.5  as +1% increase shows us 31% = 69.7  ( 0.31 x 225 = 69.74)

Step-by-step explanation:

88/225  = 0.39111111111 = 39.11%%

P value 01 = 1%  =  225.225 or 5% range of alternative hypotheses.

To graph the P value we take the distance between the sample mean and the null hypothesis value (225 + 1% of sample - x nhv) = y ). We can graph the probability of obtaining a sample mean  (225 +/- ( x +1% of sample) where nhv has a decimal if needed to utilize the 1% added). we would replace nvp in this example with  Ha or H1 which means the alternative hypotheses as the data shows less than or equal to.

We can then show 225.225 -  Ha or H1  then graph the probability of obtaining a sample mean that is at least extreme in both tails  Ha or H1

However it would be the other way round where you take the first set of data and use the sample as the 30% significance of that sample indicates it may be a larger sample or a higher significance. Therefore this would be used in the graphing - 1%

We prove that 30-1 =29  where 29% of 225 = 225 x 0.29 = 65.25

this way we have proved that the new set of data being equal to 88 patients regaining their eyesight is <23 and can be written like this 65.25< x <88

This means that sample mean has taken the 1% to show on the graph we can show 225> 33.11 +1 .

We can prove that both indifference of significance would reduce when 1% is added and close based on being a higher percentage to begin with.

34.11 = 0.3411 x 225 = 76.7475 for second surgeon = 33.11% +1

Where as shown

30 = 0.3 x 225 = 67.5

76.5475 - 67.5 = 9.04 difference when comparing old method = +1%

where new method stands at 76.7475 has reduced by 11.2525 from 88 patients and where old method if reversing = 62.5 and has reduced from 67.5  as +1% and 31% = 69.7  ( 0.31 x 225 = 69.74)

You would therefore graph each higher methods first if comparing both by 0.01 or show 88 on graph and 76.7475 = +1%

NB/ if sample size was 20 more in the old data then 225+20 = 245 x 0.29 = 71.05 and would still be lower than new data. = 2.0 increase level of significance and not relevant unless you are looking for the decrease which means new is greater than 20% success than that of old method findings where 30% = 67.5.

5 0
3 years ago
20 points! Clear answers and good descriptions!<br> Thanks! :)
balu736 [363]

Answer:

1= b

2= f

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Jerome recently moved to a new city and bought a home. The assessment rate is 51%. The property tax rate is $53.26 per $1000. Wh
mrs_skeptik [129]
Given:
assessment rate = 51%
tax rate = 53.26 per 1,000

53.26 / 1000 = 0.05326
0.05326 x 100% = 5.326%

Effective tax rate = assessment rate * tax rate
ETR = 51% * 5.326%
ETR = 2.72%



8 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELPP!! WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST + 25 POINTS!!
enyata [817]

Answer:

x = -9/4

Step-by-step explanation:

−2(x + 1/4) + 1 = 5 ​

Subtract 2 from both sides.

−2(x + 1/4) = 4 ​

Divide both sides by -2.

x + 1/4 = -2

Subtract 1/4 from both sides.

x = -2 1/4

x = -9/4

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Sylvia has $100.She spent 4/10 of her money on a jacket and 20/100 of her money on jeans.What fraction of her money did Sylvia s
    11·2 answers
  • All rational numbers are whole numbers
    12·1 answer
  • Need help with question number 14. This is the hardest one yet.
    7·1 answer
  • Anyone know the right answer
    14·2 answers
  • How do I find the distance?
    14·1 answer
  • CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP ME
    12·2 answers
  • How many hours are there from 10:30 on Monday to 11:30 on Tuesday​
    5·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP GEOMETRY QUESTION!!
    7·1 answer
  • Write a statement that indicates that the triangles in each pair are congruent.
    7·1 answer
  • The price for a car in 2015 was RM 54000. This was 10% higher compared to the year 2014?​
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!