1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
CaHeK987 [17]
2 years ago
13

What insight does ceasar defeat of antony in the battlefield provide about his ability to secure his political success in rome

English
1 answer:
Fofino [41]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Anthony’s defeat shows that Ceasar’s ability to guarantee political success was weakened.

Explanation:

Under the command of Ceasaar, Anthony is defeated in the battle and Actium, by Octavian. This episode weakens Ceasar's leadership and causes him to lose his ability to protect and promote Rome's political success, as he knows that his authority will be questioned, as it was, when Octavian launched the attack that destroyed the Roman empire.

You might be interested in
Can Someone Help Me On How To Do This Pleasee Like im Very Confused.
kozerog [31]
Nwkdksosoqm ididjebzbs nnnd
6 0
3 years ago
What does breadth means??
Vlad1618 [11]
It means range, amplitude or scope. or the distance or measurement from one side to another side. also known as width.
3 0
3 years ago
Read the first stanza of Wallace Stevens's 'The Anecdote of the Jar' below:
Zinaida [17]

Answer:

  • <u>Option-(C):</u>

I put a round jar on a hill in Tennessee, and the jar made the  wilderness surround it.

Explanation:

  • <u>Paraphrase of the stanza:</u>

In the poem written by Wallace Stevens's "The Anecdote of the Jar". The poet describes the whole scene of him placing the round jar on a certain point on a hill in the state of Tennessee,United States. As he describes it in a very unique way that the jar was surrounded by the wilderness of the environment.

As, there was something special about placing the material or object in the a place surrounded by the factors of nature. While, it is very obvious for any author, philosopher or any person related to arts to think in a more creative way.

6 0
3 years ago
What is Ragnarok?
Tcecarenko [31]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
(Brainliest)
Sergeeva-Olga [200]

Answer:

One of the best-known theories exploring some of these basic questions was developed by a psychologist named Lawrence Kohlberg. His work modified and expanded upon Jean Piaget's previous work to form a theory that explained how children develop moral reasoning.

Piaget described a two-stage process of moral development while Kohlberg's theory of moral development outlined six stages within three different levels. Kohlberg extended Piaget's theory, proposing that moral development is a continual process that occurs throughout the lifespan.

In recent years, Kohlberg's theory has been criticized as being Western-centric with a bias toward men (he primarily used male research subjects) and with having a narrow worldview based on upper-middle-class value systems and perspectives.

The Heinz Dilemma: Kohlberg's Approach to the Study of Moral Reasoning

Kohlberg based his theory on a series of moral dilemmas were presented to these participants and they were also interviewed to determine the reasoning behind their judgments of each scenario.

One example was "Heinz Steals the Drug." In this scenario, a woman has cancer and her doctors believe only one drug might save her. This drug had been discovered by a local pharmacist and he was able to make it for $200 per dose and sell it for $2,000 per dose. The woman's husband, Heinz, could only raise $1,000 to buy the drug. He tried to negotiate with the pharmacist for a lower price or to be extended credit to pay for it over time. But the pharmacist refused to sell it for any less or to accept partial payments. Rebuffed, Heinz instead broke into the pharmacy and stole the drug to save his wife. Kohlberg asked, "Should the husband have done that?"

Kohlberg was not interested so much in the answer to questioning whether Heinz was wrong or right but in the reasoning for each participant's decision. The responses were then classified into various stages of reasoning in his theory of moral development.

and no i dotn agree

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Assess Booth's claims that his "action was purer than" that of Brutus and that he never sought any personal gain.
    9·1 answer
  • What can robots do that humans cannot do iready
    5·2 answers
  • The man flung a look back along the way he had come. The Yukon lay a mile wide and hidden under three feet of ice. On top of thi
    13·2 answers
  • The narrator describes Colonel Killigrew as not believing a word of the doctor's story. However, Killigrew's words indicate that
    12·1 answer
  • Otis sent John a car. Choose the correct option from the analysis below---------------------------------------- Otis----subject,
    13·2 answers
  • Who Is Your Crush? Anyone?
    6·1 answer
  • Explain the steps you would take to model a desert community in which 77% of the area is covered with houses.
    10·2 answers
  • Which two of the following best identify the central ideas of this text?
    6·2 answers
  • Here is a story please read it then answer the questions
    14·1 answer
  • I am 7 letter word. i become longer when the third letter is removed. what am i?​
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!