The correct answer would be Aesthetic Modification.
In repositioning the product, Coca Cola changed the taste of the product. It also changed the look of the product with a larger can size and different colors. This is an example of an Aesthetic Modification.
Explanation:
Repositioning is the process of placing something in a different place. Aesthetic Modification is a part of repositioning.
Aesthetics are basically concerned with the beauty or anything related to beauty, like appreciating or enhancing it.
Now Aesthetic Modification is a strategy in marketing in which the aesthetics of a product are changed by the company to reposition it. Aesthetic modification is the changes in the taste, texture, sound, smell, or appearance of the product.
So when Coca Cola changed the taste, size and color of the can, and the overall look of the product, it means Coca Cola did Aesthetic Modification.
Learn more about Brand Repositioning at:
brainly.com/question/13006074
#LearnWithBrainly
To recognize this technique, pay attention to the background of the ad or to the story of the commercial. The transfer technique wants you to associate the good feelings created in the ad with the product. For example, a commercial showing a happy family eating soup may want you to associate a feeling of comfort and security with their soup products.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
When taxes are lower, people tend to spend more money. Thus, the total spending in the economy increases.
Brainliest please??
Answer:
the bill becomes law over the President's objections.
Explanation:
The power of the President to refuse to approve a bill or joint resolution and thus prevent its enactment into law is the veto. ... This veto can be overridden only by a two-thirds vote in both the Senate and the House.
Answer:
B.mental health professionals could not reliably assess whether mental illness caused criminal behavior
Explanation:
Judge David Bazelon was who proposed to do a scientific exam about mental illness in the criminal area. In the end, his ruling established that the defendant was not responsible for his criminal act if he was suffering from being mentally unstable. However, there is no verifiable certainty that the defendant, because of his illness, committed the crimes.
