The people who organized the women's world cup in 1999 took a risk when they held matchesnin big stadiums. Why was this a risk

Social Studies

1 answer:

borishaifa [10]3 years ago

8 0

Explanation:

The Women's world cup in soccer took place in the United States of America. in 1999. The American team also won the world cup. But, organizing the world cup was a task of monumental risk for the people who were responsible for organizing it. Most matches were organized in big stadiums which had huge audience capacity and thus also cost more. At the time, very little people had knowledge about the world cup happening. There was almost no excitement in the country regarding the event. The soccer is one of less popular sports in the states as compared to american football , or NBA.

The major risk was that people were not aware of other counties' players. All the American eyes were on American team. If the team had failed to perform as expected, the organizers could have suffered humongous losses.

You might be interested in

Which of these are some of the largest grazers in the tundra? (Select all that apply.)

Sauron [17]

Answer: reindeer and muskox

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Brandon believes that american culture is superior to other cultures. this is a form of

VashaNatasha [74]

Answer: "ethnocentrism" .
______________________________________________________

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the role of the polls in an election? How do they influence the final outcome?

Ganezh [65]

The polls are an accurate count of votes on either side the higher the polls the higher the votes

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A scientist suspects that food in an ecosystem may have been contaminated by radioactive nitrogen over a period of several month

Scrat [10]

Answer:

Hair

Explanation:

The scientist predict that the contamination occurred several months ago. Under normal circumstances, most organisms would no longer have a trace of exposure in their urine or blood after 3 months. If the organisms exposed to the radioactive three months ago and do not come near that area again within 3 months, the scientist wouldn't be able to identify it.

But, if that substance got into their hair, it will last way longer than that. Hair Analysis is very common to be used among forensic toxicologist to identify contamination that occurred months because of this.

7 0

4 years ago

in context of the issue of confidentiality, if someone other than the experimenter will have access to data, this should be expl

Alexeev081 [22]

The statement is True.

Confidentiality refers back to the obligation to guard privileged facts and to proportion entrusted information responsibly. It stems from the notion that a person's wishes, selections, and private information ought to be handled with admiration. The duty of confidentiality can observe in people, companies, and establishments.

The confidentiality method respects a person's privacy, and abstains from sharing private or doubtlessly touchy facts about a person, mainly if that data has been shared in confidence.

The precept of confidentiality is ready privacy and respecting a person's desires. It way that professionals should not proportion non-public information about someone with others, except that man or woman has said they could or it is without a doubt necessary.

Learn more about confidentiality here brainly.com/question/863709

#SPJ4

8 0

2 years ago