All categories

2 years ago

WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO THE BEST ANSWER

Mathematics

2 answers:

Nimfa-mama [501]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

vladimir1956 [14]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The best awnser I believe would be A. Dialect

You might be interested in

Find the value of x. Round to the nearest tenth.

Charra [1.4K]

19/x=sin 20
19/sin 20=x
x=55.5522836

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In the probability distribution to the right, the random variable X represents the number of marriages an individual aged 15 ye

kodGreya [7K]

The table of the probability is missing, so i have attached it.

Answer:

μ = 0.919

The interpretation of this is that;on the average, an individual aged 15 years or older has been involved in 0.919 marriages.

Step-by-step explanation:

The expected value which is also called mean value is denoted by the symbol μ. It is defined as the sum of the product of each possibility x with it's probability P(x) as the formula;

μ = Σx.P(x) = (0 × 0.272) + (1 × 0.575) + (2 × 0.121) + (3 × 0.027) + (4 × 0.004) + (5 × 0.001)

μ = 0.919

Thus, the interpretation of this is that;on the average, an individual aged 15 years or older has been involved in 0.919 marriages.

5 0

3 years ago

The function f(x)=125(0.9)x models the population of a species of fly in millions after x years.

SSSSS [86.1K]

A word to the wise: It's <span> f(x)=125(0.9)^x, where ^ represents exponentiation.

In this case the ave. value over the interval [11, 15] is

125(0.9)^15 - 125(0.9)^11
------------------------------------- = (125/4) [ 0.9^15 - 0.9^11)
15 - 11 = (31.25) [ 0.2059 - 0.3138 ] = a negative result
= (31.25)(-0.1079) = -3.372 (av. r. of c.
over the interval [11,15] )

Do the same thing for the time interval [1,5]. Then compare the two rates of change.</span>

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please help and explain I’m stuck

damaskus [11]

10m+27 you add the sides to find perimeter so add 2m+2m+2m and so on and it gives u 10m+27

3 0

3 years ago

According to the US Bureau of labor statistics, 7% of US female workers between 16 and 24 years old are paid at the minimum wage

vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

The Null Hypothesis is $H_o:k_o = 0.07$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a :k_o \ne 0.07$

Decision rule

If the test staistics is greater than the critical value of significance level then $H_o$ is accepted else $H_o$ is rejected

With the above in mind

The critical value of the significance level which is obtained from the table is

$t_{0.05} = 1.645$

Now since the critical value of significance level is greater than the test staistics then the null hypothesis will be rejected

Conclusion

The information is not enough to back the claim that state differs from the nation

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The percentage of US female workers paid at the minimum wage or less is $k_o =$ 7% = 0.07

The sample size is $n = 500$

The number paid minimum wage or less is x = 42

The significance level is $\alpha =$ 5% = 0.05

Now the probability of getting a US female workers paid at the minimum wage or less is mathematically represented as

$\= k = \frac{x}{n}$

substituting value

$\= k = \frac{42}{500}$

$\= k = 0.084$

The Null Hypothesis is $H_o:k_o = 0.07$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a :k_o \ne 0.07$

Generally the test statistics is mathematically evaluated as

$z = \frac{\= k - k_o}{\sqrt{\frac{k_o(1-k_o)}{n} } }$

substituting value

$z = \frac{0.084 - 0.07}{\sqrt{\frac{0.07 (1-0.07)}{500} } }$

$z = 1.23$

Now the Decision rule is stated as

If the test staistics is greater than the critical value of significance level then $H_o$ is accepted else $H_o$ is rejected

With the above in mind

The critical value of the significance level which is obtained from the table is

$t_{0.05} = 1.645$

Now since the critical value of significance level is greater than the test staistics then the null hypothesis will be rejected

So the conclusion will be

The information is not enough to back the claim that state differs from the nation

4 0

3 years ago