Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
1. If I do not grumble while doing the logic exam, then it is because I understand the questions.
2. If the arguments are not arranged in regular order, then I will not be used to these examples.
3. If my headaches, then it is probably because it is not an easy example.
4. If the arguments are not arranged in regular order like I am used to, then I will not be able to understand them.
5. If the example is not easy and I am grumbling, then it is because it is giving me a headache.
The difference between Tucker and Karly's take is that Tucker's solution is analytical while Karly's is graphical. But both are correct either way.
For Tucker's solution, let's say at x=-3 the value for y is 4, and at x=3, the value of y is still 4, then the average rate of change or slope is 0. Note that the slope of the curve is Δy/Δx. Since there is no change for Δy, the slope is zero.
For Karly's solution, even if the curve travels high or low but would have the same elevation of x=-3 and x=3, the average rate of change is still zero. It is actually just same with Tucker's but Karly just verbalizes her solution that was observed visually.
i think is B
Step-by-step explanation:
g(x)=[x+4]10
Answer:
sorry i dont know the answer .
