The transformation of <span>f(x)=15tanx would be achieved by dilating y</span>=tanx graph 15 times. This transformation will cause y'=15 y. This will increase the value of dilation become 15 times of the original
The transformation of g(x)=15tanx would be achieved by shifting y=tanx graph 15 right. This transformation will cause x'=x+15. This will change the value from tan x into tan(x+15)
Answer:
3 hours is 60×3=180
1/6 of 180 =180÷ 6= 30
30 mins is the answer
Step-by-step explanation:
if you want to find another position other than 1/6 like 4/6 then you can just times the answer in this case 30 by the amout u need in this case 4 so 4/6 would be 120 which is 2 hours
1. Answer (D). By the law of sines, we have 
in any 
2. Answer (C). The law of cosines, 
accepts up to three sides and an angle as an input.
3. Answer (D). Although this triangle is right, we are not given enough information to uniquely determine its sides and angles - here, we need either one more side or one more angle.
4. Answer (D). Don't get tripped up by answer choice (C) - this is just a rearrangement of the statement of the law of cosines. In choice (D), the signs of 
and 
are reversed.
5. Answer (B). By the law of sines, we have 
Solving gives 
Note that this is the <em>ambiguous (SSA) case</em> of the law of sines, where the given measures could specify one triangle, two triangles, or none at all!
6. Answer (A). Since we know all three sides and none of the angles, starting with the law of sines will not help, so we begin with the law of cosines to find one angle; from there, we can use the law of sines to find the remaining angles.
Answer:
Pete
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
Mandy's Estimate :
Number of spins , n = 20
Pete's Estimate:
Number of spins, n = 200
A good probability estimate is one which has narrow margin of error with a high degree of confidence. These two variables are affected by sample size.
A high sample size give a narrower margin of error and increases the confidence level probability
Based on the sample size used by each of Pete and Mandy, we can conclude that, Pete's probability estimate would be better due to its significantly higher sample size.
300, because 8x20=160 so 1 ounces= 20 calories
15x20=300
