It is c.............................................
Answer: D. Maria would not have to pay anything
Explanation:
Maria would not have to pay anything because this does not fall under the terms of a QUASI CONTRACT as she did not gain unjustified enrichment.
In a QUASI contract, the main bone of contention is the ACCEPTANCE of a service but not the AGREEMENT of terms which can lead to unjust enrichment. In other words, if you ACCEPT a service but did not request it, you still have to pay.
Maria in this case neither requested NOR ACCEPTED the service and so she does not have to pay.
<span>It
is the First Amendment. Under this you
can appeal to the government to remedy any complaint especially when a mistake
was committed. This is important because
a person’s life may be at stake due to that mistake. This way there is a chance to make it better.</span>
Answer: Chocolate syrup
Explanation: Hope this helps :)
