Victoria's method is linear because the number of minutes increase by an equal number (15) every month.
Workings in the attachments below. The green line is the function that has been set up for Victoria. The lines that form a curved looking graph belong to the function that was set up for Zach.
Answer:
<u>greater than what it was before</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>Remember</em>, a tornado usually causes significant structural damages to houses within its area of impact., and this requires running expenses to repair the damage.
Hence,<u> since the term </u><u>expenditure, </u><u>also implies expenses; we can expect the total expenditure on housing after the tornado to be </u><u>greater than</u><u> what it was before the tornado since families would be paying for repairs.</u>
donuts and cream puffs were 45 & 4 respectively !
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
Here we have , twice the number of donuts was only 6 less than 24 times the number of cream puffs. 10 times the number of cream puffs was only 5 less than the number of donuts We need to find how many donuts and cream puffs were there . Let's find out:
Let number of donuts and cream puffs are x & y respectively ! So ,
- twice the number of donuts was only 6 less than 24 times the number of cream puffs
According to this statement equation is :
⇒ 
⇒
................(1)
- 10 times the number of cream puffs was only 5 less than the number of donuts
According to this statement equation is :
⇒ 
⇒
................(2)
Equation (1) & (2) :
⇒ 
⇒ 
⇒ 
Putting
in
:
⇒ 
⇒ 
Therefore , donuts and cream puffs were 45 & 4 respectively !
Hello there!
The additive inverse of any number just means to flip it's value.
For example;
The number "3" would have an additive inverse of "-3".
The number "-15" would have an additive inverse of "15".
Since we have "52", we can flip the value sign of it.
We now have -52 and 52.
Since the question asked us to sum our numbers, we need to add them.
-52 + 52 = 0
The sum of 52 and its additive inverse is 0.
I hope this helps!
Answer:
The 93% confidence interval for the true proportion of masks of this type whose lenses would pop out at 325 degrees is (0.3154, 0.5574). This means that we are 93% sure that the true proportion of masks of this type whose lenses would pop out at 325 degrees is (0.3154, 0.5574).
Step-by-step explanation:
In a sample with a number n of people surveyed with a probability of a success of
, and a confidence level of
, we have the following confidence interval of proportions.

In which
z is the zscore that has a pvalue of
.
For this problem, we have that:

93% confidence level
So
, z is the value of Z that has a pvalue of
, so
.
The lower limit of this interval is:

The upper limit of this interval is:

The 93% confidence interval for the true proportion of masks of this type whose lenses would pop out at 325 degrees is (0.3154, 0.5574). This means that we are 93% sure that the true proportion of masks of this type whose lenses would pop out at 325 degrees is (0.3154, 0.5574).