1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stich3 [128]
3 years ago
10

What is the scientific word for paranormal

History
2 answers:
ikadub [295]3 years ago
7 0
metaphysical maybe?
FrozenT [24]3 years ago
4 0
Abnormal, celestial, or occult
You might be interested in
Nueve eventos que te permitan entender el conflicto entre la Unión de Repúblicas Socialistas Soviéticas y Estados Unidos y el pa
Roman55 [17]

La respuesta correcta a esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.

Los nueve eventos que nos permiten entender el conflicto entre la Unión de Repúblicas Socialistas Soviéticas y Estados Unidos durante el periodo llamado de la Guerra Fría, son los siguientes.

1) El primer incidente grave entre estos dos países fue el bloqueo de Berlín, ordenado por el líder Soviético Joseph Stalin en Junio de 1948. Las tropas Rusas bloquearon las entradas hacia Berlín, como una represalia por las decisiones de los Aliados.

2) El segundo incidente fue la decisión de los Aliados de llevar víveres, alimentos y provisiones a Berlín, por medio de aviones. Durante los once meses siguientes, aviones de la Fuerza Aérea Británica y Norteamericana transportaron todo tipo de ayuda a Berlín.

3) El derribo del avión norteamericano "U-2," en mayo 1, de 1960.

4) La Crisis de los Misiles Cubano, en octubre de 1962. El mundo estuvo al borde de otra Guerra Mundial, debido a la crisis por los Misiles Soviéticos instalados en Cuba, que apuntaban a las ciudades importantes de los Estados Unidos.

5) La Guerra de Corea. En su lucha por mantener el control en ciertas regiones del mundo, la Unión Soviética brindó apoyo a Corea del Norte, bajo la influencia Comunista. Como era de esperarse, los Estados Unidos dieron todo su respaldo a Corea del Sur.

b) Algo similar sucedió con La Guerra de Vietnam. Estados Unidos decidió apoyar a Vietnam del Sur, mientras que la URSS decidió apoyar a Vietnam del Norte.

7) El lanzamiento del satélite Soviético Sputnik, que representó una clara ventaja de los Soviéticos sobre los norteamericanos, por conquistar el espacio.

8) La firma del tratado SALT, para limitar la producción de misiles nucleares.

9) La etapa de renovación de la URSS con la implementación de los programas Glasnot y Perestroika, respaldados por el líder Soviético Mikahil Gorbachev.

Durante todo este conflicto, la mayoría de países Latinoamericanos se mantuvieron a la expectativa pero por razones geográficas naturales, se veían inclinados a favorecer las decisiones de los Estados Unidos. La única excepción fue Cuba. Fidel Castro decidió sumarse al apoyo Soviético e instaló el Comunismo en su país.

3 0
3 years ago
“He who has a why to live for can bear almost any how.” --quote by Nietzsche.
alexgriva [62]
This is a personal question but Nietzsche meant that a person with nothing to live for subconsciously prefers to death, but someone who has something to live for (the reason WHY he continues to live) can insure almost anything. So you personally have to answer what helps you get through the day, or what makes you want to continue living.
4 0
3 years ago
In the years before the civil war, which state was most likely to favor high tariffs
tigry1 [53]

Answer:

New york

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What caused conflict between various groups of people in the west
Gelneren [198K]
<span>At the core of most intractable conflicts are deeply rooted divisions affecting parties' fundamental interests, needs and values. These include irreconcilable moral values, matters of justice and human rights, high-stakes distributional issues, unmet human needs, and issues of identity. Such conflicts tend to be protracted and have very damaging effects.IntroductionIntractable conflicts are ones that remain unresolved for long periods of time and then become stuck at a high level of intensity and destructiveness. They typically involve many parties and concern an intricate set of historical, religious, cultural, political, and economic issues.[1] These matters are central to human social existence and typically resist any attempts at resolution. In fact, parties often refuse to negotiate or compromise with respect to such issues. As a result, each side views the rigid position of the other as a threat to its very existence. They may develop a mutual fear of each other and a profound desire to inflict as much physical and psychological harm on each other as possible.[2] This sense of threat and hostility often pervades the everyday lives of the parties involved and overrides their ability to recognize any shared concerns they might have.<span>


Additional insights into the underlying causes of intractable conflicts are offered by Beyond Intractability project participants.</span>As conflict escalates, any tangible issues may become embedded within a larger set of values, beliefs, identities, and cultures. Disputes about land, money, or other resources may take on increased symbolic significance.[3] Over the course of conflict, the original issues can even become irrelevant as new causes for conflict are generated by actions within the conflict itself. Those on opposing sides come to view each other as enemies and may resort to highly destructive means. Eventually, the parties become unable to separate different issues and may see no way out of the conflict other than through total victory or defeat.[4]Why do some conflicts become intractable? Many describe intractability in terms of the destructive relationship dynamics that govern the adversaries' interaction. For example, if one party resorts to inhumane treatment in waging conflict, this deepens antagonism and may lead the opposing side to seek revenge.[5] Likewise, when extremist political leaders appeal to ethno-nationalist ideology to arouse fear, this may increase support for the use of violence and contribute to intractability. Other factors that make some conflicts extremely difficult to resolve include the vast numbers of people involved, the large number of complex issues to be resolved, and a previous history of violent confrontation. But what are the underlying causes of these destructive conflict dynamics?What is common to all intractable conflicts is that they involve interests or values that the disputants regard as critical to their survival. These underlying causes include parties' moral values, identities, and fundamental human needs. Because conflicts grounded in these issues involve the basic molds for thought and action within given communities and culture, they are usually not resolvable by negotiation or compromise.[6] This is because the problem in question is one that cannot be resolved in a win-win way. If one value system is followed, another is threatened. If one nation controls a piece of land, another does not. If one group is dominant, another is subordinate.While sharing is possible in theory, contending sides usually regard compromise as a loss. This is especially true in societies where natural fear and hatred is so ingrained that opposing groups cannot imagine living with or working cooperatively with the other side. Instead, they are often willing to take whatever means necessary to ensure group survival and protect their way of life. Below are brief summaries of some of the central underlying causes of intractable conflict.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
PLEASE ANSWER!!!! I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST ANSWER!!!! THIS MY FINAL FOR CLASS!!!!!!! PLEASE ANSWER CORRECTLY!!!!!
densk [106]
-Jamestown: unstable relations with Powhatans
<span>-Plymouth: good relations until war was later declared in 1636

</span>-Jamestown: representative gov. 
<span>-Plymouth: self-gov. agreement- Mayflower Compact
</span>
-Jamestown: inexperience, unwillingness to work, poor Indian relations, disease, starvation
<span>-Plymouth: hunger, disease, environmental hazards</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What distinct contribution to American literature did authors such as Langston Hughes and Zora Neale Hurston make?
    8·1 answer
  • Why does Hugo refer to Paris as the "central shaft of the mine"?
    5·2 answers
  • Which statement would Ralph Waldo Emerson most likely agree with?
    5·1 answer
  • Was the New Deal a success or Failure Explain in detail why or why not must be one paragraph.
    5·1 answer
  • Of the jobs described which one would you most want to do? explain
    13·2 answers
  • 3. According to the video, British soldier Henry Tandey could have shot Adolf Hitler in World War I. Make an argument for or aga
    10·1 answer
  • Who is the chief executive officer of the state
    7·1 answer
  • Is legalism in china today?
    7·2 answers
  • Do you believe that harriet tubman should be put on the $20 bill?​
    13·1 answer
  • By the summer of 1929, the economy was suffering. People had built up massive debt after a decade of fast spending. They could n
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!