Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
7
6-
Progr
5
4-
Introdu
3
С
2
1+
1
20
Transla
-7 -6 -5 -4
-32
1
À 3 4 5 6 7
-2
-3
Quiz 1
-4+
A
-5
Unit
Do 5 problems
It’s B because it equals -8 when simplified which is a rational number
Hope this helps I got (-1, 7)
Answer:
<h2>1. 14 in</h2><h2>2. 28 in.</h2><h2>3. 43 in</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
x 2x 3x + 1
|---------|-------------------|---------------------------|
|<-------------------- 85 in ------------------------>|
85 = x + 2x + 3x + 1
85 - 1 = 6x
x = 84 / 6
x = 14
1st piece = 14 in
2nd piece = 2(14) = 28 in
3rd piece = 3(14) + 1 = 43 in
----------------------------
total = 85 in
Answer:
Rolling case achieves greater height than sliding case
Step-by-step explanation:
For sliding ball:
- When balls slides up the ramp the kinetic energy is converted to gravitational potential energy.
- We have frictionless ramp, hence no loss due to friction.So the entire kinetic energy is converted into potential energy.
- The ball slides it only has translational kinetic energy as follows:
ΔK.E = ΔP.E
0.5*m*v^2 = m*g*h
h = 0.5v^2 / g
For rolling ball:
- Its the same as the previous case but only difference is that there are two forms of kinetic energy translational and rotational. Thus the energy balance is:
ΔK.E = ΔP.E
0.5*m*v^2 + 0.5*I*w^2 = m*g*h
- Where I: moment of inertia of spherical ball = 2/5 *m*r^2
w: Angular speed = v / r
0.5*m*v^2 + 0.2*m*v^2 = m*g*h
0.7v^2 = g*h
h = 0.7v^2 / g
- From both results we see that 0.7v^2/g for rolling case is greater than 0.5v^2/g sliding case.
