Law enforcement officers aka the police has the sole purpose to protect and serve a community of people in their jurisdiction. A SWAT team specializes in high-risk situations i.e hostage situations, bomb threats, high profile warrant subjects. They are appropriately decked out in armored vehicles tactical combative gear and are equipped with powerful rifles to execute contracts that regular police officers aren’t equipped for.
Answer:
From the turn of the twentieth century, ladies have reserved the privilege to represent parliament and partake in government in Australia. Following alliance, the public authority of the recently shaped Commonwealth of Australia passed the Commonwealth Franchise Act 1902 permitting most ladies to both vote and remain at the 1903 Federal political decision. South Australia and Western Australia conceded ladies the vote before alliance, and the territories of New South Wales, Tasmania, Queensland and Victoria likewise passed enactment permitting ladies to partake in government at the state and neighborhood levels following league. Native Australian ladies didn't accomplish testimonial at all degrees of government and in all states and domains until 1962.
Explanation:
The correct option is (c); Yes, because the court took all well-pleaded facts in the complaint as true and resolved all doubts and inferences in the defendant's favor.
<h3>What is third-part defendant?</h3>
A third-party defendant is a person or entity that the primary defendant sues and adds to the case under the theory that they are accountable to the defendant for all or part of the plaintiff's claim.
For the given case:
- The court must accept as true all of the well-pleaded facts in the complaint and resolve any questions and inferences in the complainant's favor before deciding whether to grant a motion to dismiss for failure to establish a claim on which relief can be granted. The complainant in this case is the defendant.
- Answer option A is erroneous because the third-party defendant's move was a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on which relief can be given, not a petition to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Furthermore, not withstanding the lack of diversity of citizenship, the court has subject-matter jurisdiction over the defendant's contribution complaint since it is based on federal law, even though it may raise the question of lack of subject-matter jurisdiction on its own.
- B is the incorrect response option. The court may only take into account the claims in the complaint, any exhibits attached to the complaint, and any matters susceptible to judicial notice when deciding whether to grant a motion to dismiss for failure to establish a claim on which relief can be granted. (Remember that for a request for summary judgment, the court could take into account outside information like an affidavit.)
- Because any party against whom a claim is made may file a motion to dismiss for failure to articulate a claim upon which relief can be given, answer choice D is wrong.
To know more about jurisdiction and its types, here
brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
According to natural law theory, all people have inherent rights, conferred not by act of legislation but by "God, nature, or reason." Natural law theory can also refer to "theories of ethics, theories of politics, theories of civil law, and theories of religious morality." Natural law has roots in Western philosophy.
Natural law - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Natural_law
Answer:
They become stronger and have more people participating in the government because the government put trust in the people by being table
Explanation:
