1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
REY [17]
3 years ago
7

David was walking along the sidewalk in a park and sees a purse lying on the ground. David picks it up and finds $1000, as well

as identification in the purse. David intends to return it to the owner but walks away with it. Has David committed a crime? If so, which crime and why? If not, why wasn't it a crime?
Law
1 answer:
MissTica3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

yes David committed a crime

Explanation:

because he had the chance to return the purse but he walked away with it

You might be interested in
How is sovereignty a democratic one​
schepotkina [342]

Answer:

Because they want more authority or power over someone.

3 0
3 years ago
You are called to the scene of an explosion on the 4th of July. You observe the following characteristics:
Dmitry [639]

Answer:

A bomb

Explanation:

Breifcases are usually used as a trigger to the bomb. If there is an untouched briefcase, chances of it being a trigger are very high.

4 0
3 years ago
Consumers in a country are concerned that cars they drive create too much air pollution, which response would most likely occur
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

Answer:

B. Businesses would compete by making new cars that produce less pollution.

Explanation:

Correct for Apex

4 0
3 years ago
Mr. Nguyen understands that Medicare prescription drug plans can use a formulary or list of covered drugs. He is suspicious abou
dimaraw [331]

Answer:

He should be made to understand that formularies must be developed with input from health practitioners such as pharmacists,doctors, etc.

Explanation:

Mr. Nguyen is suspicious about how plans establish these formularies. His suspicions should be allayed by explaining the basic principles of how formularies are established.

This involves the input of Health practitioners or experts who focus on various properties of the formularies to ensure it has a high efficacy and fit for consumption.

6 0
3 years ago
Brown v Ohio: what is the issue of this case?
Free_Kalibri [48]

Answer:

Brown v. Ohio is the case of the Double Jeopardy Clause ruled by the Supreme Court of the US on June 16, 1977.

Explanation:

"Brown v Ohio" is a landmark case in the history of the Supreme Court of the United States. In this case, Nathaniel Brown stole a Chevrolet an East Cleveland and was caught nine days later by Wickliffe officials. He was charged with 'joyriding' by Wickliffe officials and sentenced to jail for one month with a penalty of $100. After his release, he went to East Cleveland, where he was again caught and convicted of the same. Brown, then, pleaded the Double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment in the Supreme Court, where the courts reversed the Appalette court's decision.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Discuss what changes you think typical
    7·1 answer
  • How might a person trained to be a prosecutor become an Assistant US Attorney (AUSA)?
    15·2 answers
  • ⦁ How does the Fourteenth Amendment define a U.S. citizen?
    12·2 answers
  • What form of government has the power divided among national, state, and local governments?
    7·2 answers
  • Hurry pls help give brainleist
    12·1 answer
  • Me ayudan es una tarea de formación cívica y etiaca
    11·1 answer
  • What causes the object that moves along a surface to slow down and eventually stop​
    10·1 answer
  • What does the law of demand state?
    14·2 answers
  • What is environmental studies??
    15·2 answers
  • Trial courts in the federal judicial system are called.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!