Keeping the urine dilute by maintaining a high volume of fluid intake, is the key to preventing the risk of toxicity from sulfonamide medications.
Sulfonamides may be systemically absorbed when applied to the skin, eye, or mucosal membranes. The use of sulfonamides has been associated with hematologic toxicity, including methemoglobinemia, sulfhemoglobinemia, leukopenia, granulocytopenia, eosinophilia, hemolytic anaemia, aplastic anaemia, purpura, clotting disorder, thrombocytopenia, hypofibrinogenemia, and hypoprothrombinemia.
Therapy with topical sulfonamides should be administered cautiously in patients with preexisting blood dyscrasias or bone marrow suppression. Complete blood counts should be obtained regularly during prolonged therapy (>2 weeks), and patients should be instructed to immediately report any signs or symptoms suggestive of blood dyscrasia such as fever, sore throat, local infection, bleeding, pallor, dizziness, or jaundice.
Learn more about sulfonamides here: brainly.com/question/28162949
#SPJ4
False. The human needs 6-8 glasses of water a day.
It is actually quite hard to decide. I guess you could say barrier methods could be considered more reliable, due to the fact that they physically stop conception (for example, a condom physically stops any sperm from reaching the egg) compared to hormonal methods, which rely on hormones to trigger certain responses in the body that prevent pregnancy, but hormonal methods, such as the oral contraceptive pill, have been reported to have a high success rate. However, hormonal methods have been known to have different side effects due to the sudden change in hormones in the body, and may not be as effective on each person due to every person's hormone balance to be different. Also, certain barrier methods (eg. condoms) help to prevent the spread of STIs/STDs, which hormonal methods do not do.
Answer: D but im not sure but it seems like the most reasonable answer
Explanation:
Answer:
Based on what you are providing here, it would be Charlotte and James should tell their children stories related to both their cultures.
Explanation: With only allowing one parent's perspective, the other parent's culture is being excluded. Additionally, allowing the children to witness arguments over such discussion is not necessary, and lastly, not letting the grandma spend time with the children is not beneficial.
I hope this give clear understanding to your question. :)
