Answer:
CCl4 - Nonpolar
CH3OH - polar
NH3 - polar
CS2 - Nonpolar
Explanation:
One important thing that we should know is that polarity has to do with the presence of a resultant dipole moment in a molecule.
Dipole moment is a vector quantity, This means that its direction is also taken into account when discussing the dipole moment of molecules.
Hence, symmetrical molecules such as CS2 and CCl4 are non-polar even though they have polar bonds because their dipoles cancel out(zero resultant dipole moment).
On the other hand, NH3 and CH3OH are non-symmetrical molecules hence they possess an overall dipole moment and are polar molecules.
Since Au is a symbol for Gold, and once you split the name into to giving each ion its charge... you'll see that this compound has Au+2 and Cl03- .... so the name would be
Gold(II) Chlorate
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Cooling a substance causes molecules to slow down and get slightly closer together, occupying a smaller volume that results in an increase in density. Hot water is less dense and will float on room-temperature water. <u>Cold water is more dense and will sink in room-temperature water.</u>
<u></u>
Answer:
![K_a=\frac{[H^+][A^-]}{[HA]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K_a%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5BH%5E%2B%5D%5BA%5E-%5D%7D%7B%5BHA%5D%7D)
Explanation:
ka is defined as the dissociation constant of an acid. It is defined as the ratio of concentration of products to the concentration of reactants.
For the dissociation of weak acid, the chemical equation follows:
The equilibrium constant is defined by the equilibrium concentration of products over reactants:
Answer:
Project 3.
Explanation:
Project 3's anticipated cost is 12 to 17 million dollars. It is a <em>lower </em>anticipated cost than Project 2 and Project 4, but <em>higher</em> than Project 1 by one million dollars at maximum cost anticipation. Additionally, the percentage of wildlife to benefit is 70-80%, which is <em>second</em> to the most wildlife to benefit which is Project 4 at 75-80%.
And finally, for community support for Project 3 - the chart lists it as high. This outclasses Project 2 and Project 4, but balances with Project 1. However, Project 1 costs 13 to 16 million dollars and <em>only</em> benefits 15-25% of wildlife.
