The clothes dryer would've been $500 originally :)
Answer:
-4
Step-by-step explanation:
3(2x+8) = 0
Distribute
6x + 24 = 0
24 = -6x + 0
24/-6 = -4
Find the the amount of interest per year. Since $567 were earned over 6 years, you divide the interest earned by the number of years it took to accumulate it:
$567/6 years = $94.5/year
Divide that by the interest rate which the interest rate needs to be in decimal form:
$94.5/.0525 = $1800
Looks like the given limit is

With some simple algebra, we can rewrite

then distribute the limit over the product,

The first limit is 0, since 1/3ⁿ is a positive, decreasing sequence. But before claiming the overall limit is also 0, we need to show that the second limit is also finite.
For the second limit, recall the definition of the constant, <em>e</em> :

To make our limit resemble this one more closely, make a substitution; replace 9/(<em>n</em> - 9) with 1/<em>m</em>, so that

From the relation 9<em>m</em> = <em>n</em> - 9, we see that <em>m</em> also approaches infinity as <em>n</em> approaches infinity. So, the second limit is rewritten as

Now we apply some more properties of multiplication and limits:

So, the overall limit is indeed 0:

Answer:
1.) Yes
2.) Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that
n = k(k + 7)
If k is a positive integer and n = k(k + 7), is n divisible by 6 ?
(1) k is odd. Yes.
Let assume that k = 3
Then, n = 3(3 + 7)
n = 3 × 10
n = 30.
30 is divisible by 6.
(2) When k is divided by 3, the remainder is 2. That is,
Let k = 5
Then,
5/3 = 1 remainder 2
Substitute k into the equation
n = k(k + 7)
n = 5(5 + 7)
n = 5 × 12
n = 60
And 60 is divisible by 6.
Therefore, the answer to both questions is Yes.