Answer:
Land, Building and equipment
Explanation:
As we know that
Total assets include current assets, fixed assets and intangible assets Current assets involve cash, stock, account receivables, etc. Fixed assets comprise plant & machinery, property, equipment, furniture & fittings, etc.
So according to the given situation, the land, building and the equipment is considered generally as a long term asset
it's half a year out of 5, so 1/10 of the useful lifetime of the van
$61,000 - $4,900 is $56.1000
one tenth of that will be what we are looking for, so option b. should be just right to fit here
Answer:
The correct option is A, Samantha weed and Adam will rake because these are the goods each has a comparative advantage in.
Explanation:
The opportunity formula comes handy in this case, which is given below:
opportunity cost formula=what one sacrifices/what one gains
If Samantha were to weed flower beds, opportunity cost is computed thus:
Opportunity cost of Samantha weeding flower beds=8/4= 2 bags of leaves raked
The opportunity of Adam weeding flower beds=25/5 =5 bags of leaves raked.
In a nutshell ,if Samantha weeds flowers they would lose 2 bags of leaves raked while if Adam were to do so same, they would lose 5 bags of leaves raked, conclusively Samantha should weed flower beds since she has lower opportunity, higher comparative advantage
Answer:
Tell the customer when you store’s next delivery day is and to come back then Issue the customer a raincheck for the item that is out of stock
Explanation:
Customer<em> retention</em> is important as well as <em>meeting their specific needs</em>. It is unwise to turn back a customer and refer them to a competitor, this may mean loss of business (currently and in the future). Also it is unwise to offer a substitute item as this will not meet their needs (though you may want to inform them of the substitute item if they are interested). Issue the customer a raincheck for the item that is out of stock is the best way to go and keep the business.
Answer:
The correct approach will be Option A.
Explanation:
- Liability insurance on something like a subjective insurance plan implements the driver no matter with whom the automobile would be conducted, actually given it's an allowed to sign up the vehicle. Liability insurance safeguards insurance premiums whenever an automobile controlled by somebody else is operated either by the insured. They would also normally be compensated according to their car insurance policies in a somewhat circumstance.
- Besides, the compensation he maintains through his automobile is liability coverage for such a covered by insurance operating everyone else's vehicle. In many of these instances, even before driving on a highway, he doesn't own the subjective coverage could very well be implemented by the driver. Throughout the scenario mentioned, Matt was indeed killed in an accident whilst also trying to drive his friend's Christie vehicle.
- Hence, Matt's homeowner's insurance liability coverage would then kick through first. The gross amount of liabilities is $80,000, according to the verdict. The personal injury allowance of Matt becomes limited to $200,000, adequate to be insured.
The latter choice does not fit the instance in question. So, "A. Matt's premium is primary and therefore will cover the full $80,000," is the right response.
