Answer:
— Participation in the development of new rules and principles of international trade. ...
— Export diversification. ...
— Transparent, predictable and attractive investment regime. ...
— Increase of sovereign credit ratings. ...
— Strengthening positions in trade disputes.
hope this will help you if then make me brainliest please ❤️
Answer:
Syntax.
Explanation:
What Syntax studies is the principles and processes of sentences in a particular language, including the word order. In this case, the sentences "The dog chased the cat" and "The cat chased the dog" mean different things because of the word order: The dog chased the cat means that the dog was running behind the cat, after him. If the cat chased the dog, the opposite. In this simple example we notice the importance of syntax and the word order in a sentence. It's not the same if we say "The man was helped by the medic" rather than "The medic was helped by the man" even if it shares the exact same words.
Answer:
A damaged brain can reorganize itself to a large extent.
Explanation:
This was illustrated by the case of Phineas Gage who was an American man who lost a large part of his frontal lobe to a traumatic brain injury but managed to survive for over 12 years after that.
Neuroplasticity: The brain's ability to reorganize itself by forming new neural connections throughout life. ... For example, if one hemisphere of the brain is damaged, the intact hemisphere may take over some of its functions.
Oil can be extracted by oil pumps.
Hope this helps
Answer: It produces inefficient economic results under certain conditions
Explanation: The above situation is known as the paradox of voting,which tries to show that the cost of voting will always be higher than the result obtained from the voting process.This is because Majority voting undermines the importance of an individual voter. This issue was first highlighted in 1793 by Nicolas de Condorcet,where noted that in a single stage election the influence of a single voter reduces as the number of voters increase.
The paradox of voting further highlights that the expected results/outcome of a voter from an electioneering process is less than what the initial expectations.
