Answer:
ive seen a few people saying this is happening
Explanation:
maybe try emailing the apps company, make a new acc and see if that works
I believe the answer is: A.Smith knew that the invisible hand of the market was not concerned with the health of the laborer.
The power of invisible hand in the market only care about the power of supply and demand which would determine who will obtain the most wealth. Even if the process could disregard the wellness of many people, as long as the demand is met, consumers wouldn't put too much thought on the laborers.
Answer:
A. Close proximity among Australia, New Zealand, and Britain allowed for easy communication and negotiation.
Explanation:
Considering the claim stated in the question, hence, among the following options, the statement that could be used as evidence in support of the claim that "Australia and New Zealand were more successful than other British colonies in gaining independence." is option A "Close proximity among Australia, New Zealand, and Britain allowed for easy communication and negotiation."
This is because a CLOSE PROXIMITY between Great Britain, Australia, and New Zealand means these countries or colonies have a good rapport with Great Britain. Therefore, it was easier to negotiate their independence instead of going to war (for example USA) or series of agitation and protest to get their independence (for example India)
It should be $15 to help reduce poverty. It would also help struggling Americans, especially due to the pandemic who are out of a job. It would also make a better life and more stable living. Mark brainliest :)
The main reason why workers would have been reluctant to hold a strike in the early years of the factory system is because there were few jobs available, and those with jobs did not want to risk losing them over a strike.